- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

The barrier

#2

Good series. And the words are evocative. We understand you care about the communication being effective, on top of delivering knowledge or insights. Nothing wrong with the other presentation, consolidating what has been established into reference sources, but here the objective is transmission to someone who, presumably, does not have the experience or knowledge to NOT need/want to read your blog. I do need and want to. Even if parts were already there in my internal model of chess so far, to have this potential reorganization into a more compact theme based analytical grid, is useful, and reminds me that chess is a game of reasoning still.

The Dos and Don't though, should come with a fine print manual. Those are not the main message, the logic behind is.
Right? I find myself not being able to remember in the foresight problem of chess (in game) things that are not connected to other things. So basically, I like to keep the board's information part of the reasoning behind the Dos and Don'ts. For when they do not apply anymore, I can rely on the flexibility of the logic over more positions than were presented in the first exposure of the concepts, so I can detect that the conditions of the board are not met. And maybe even have some imagination to work around obstacles on my own. The idea first theory of learning, has that going for it.

Too bad, it can't be a climbing strategy in social chess competitions nowadays, the popular time controls (perhaps the extreme ones have bypassed the dominating one, but their new ideas might be only good for that time control)

But, in the text of your blog, I think I can find what I seek. And I take the capital and titling as a wink to the chess Dos and Don'ts tradition. Or I will explode out of exasperation. Anyway, there is hope.... Thanks

I apologize, if I am off-topic. And reading what I want to read, within the room left behind the written language of your blog.

Good series. And the words are evocative. We understand you care about the communication being effective, on top of delivering knowledge or insights. Nothing wrong with the other presentation, consolidating what has been established into reference sources, but here the objective is transmission to someone who, presumably, does not have the experience or knowledge to NOT need/want to read your blog. I do need and want to. Even if parts were already there in my internal model of chess so far, to have this potential reorganization into a more compact theme based analytical grid, is useful, and reminds me that chess is a game of reasoning still. The Dos and Don't though, should come with a fine print manual. Those are not the main message, the logic behind is. Right? I find myself not being able to remember in the foresight problem of chess (in game) things that are not connected to other things. So basically, I like to keep the board's information part of the reasoning behind the Dos and Don'ts. For when they do not apply anymore, I can rely on the flexibility of the logic over more positions than were presented in the first exposure of the concepts, so I can detect that the conditions of the board are not met. And maybe even have some imagination to work around obstacles on my own. The idea first theory of learning, has that going for it. Too bad, it can't be a climbing strategy in social chess competitions nowadays, the popular time controls (perhaps the extreme ones have bypassed the dominating one, but their new ideas might be only good for that time control) But, in the text of your blog, I think I can find what I seek. And I take the capital and titling as a wink to the chess Dos and Don'ts tradition. Or I will explode out of exasperation. Anyway, there is hope.... Thanks I apologize, if I am off-topic. And reading what I want to read, within the room left behind the written language of your blog.