Tournament points: 1,695,910
Team leader: casualr
A team to discuss Atomic Chess theory.
Or 1. e3 f5 2. f4!?. I don't care if this move objectively gives up white's advantage. Games like this give me a break, people are just caught completley off guard by this move: https://lichess.
one relevant game https://lichess.org/wh3qGU0J @nevergonnaberserk you're more than welcome to develop your comments at https://lichess.org/gQ1n0Wtu or provide a link to such analysis, since you're
Try 9... dxe4. After 10. fxg4 Nf6 you'll be fine.
I was talking with lecw about this and he mentioned that many strong players disliked that line as white because they perceived it as having strong chances for black. 6. Bb5+ seems to be very popul
Nice. It does bug me a bit that challonge doesn't allow 0.5 points. I could show the scores multiplied by 10 for example, but that felt a bit strange as well. All the games are currently saved for
I found it troublesome to browse the games of the Atomic WC 2017 bracket. The challengeon bracket does not list the games ( it seems it cannot even record fractional scores ). So you have to go thr
Instead of queening, white could use the time to win by KOTH, once he is materially ahead (taking a positional advantage instead) so I don't think it would really add chances for black (unless only bl
There was discussion about whether lichess should provide user blogs. Nowadays lichess became very conservative in introducing new features, so this too went down the drain. Still want a blog on li
Hello all, I've been writing a little blog here on lichess for a little while now (soon to be two months). There are articles for beginners (the "New to nuke" series), some articles on various patt