Tournament points: 3,401,832
Team leader: casualr
A team to discuss Atomic Chess theory.
This is cool, thx!
This link has already been posted in this forum, however in raw url encoded form. Finally intelligence came to me and I asked myself: why am I posting either such long links or try to shorten them
I have been of the belief that in a Classical or Rapid game, it would usually be a draw or win for white, but if you're playing Blitz or Bullet, it is harder for black to make the right moves quickly
My opinion on these lines is pretty much the same as 10 years ago i.e. that they are +- if White knows what to do. The only nice thing about it is that Stockfish doesn't understand what's going on, so
Are we sure that all deviations by both sides between 9...Rxa2 and 12...Rg8 are inferior?
1. e3 e6 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nd4 c6 4. Nb5 cxb5 5. Qh5+ g6 6. Qb5 Nc6 7. Qb6 axb6 8. Bb5 Kf7 9. Bxd7 Rxa2 10. b4 Nh6 11. Bb2 f5 12. h3 Rg8 13. Bg7 Bd6 14. Bf8 Bh2 15. d4 Ke8 16. c4 Nf7 17. c5 Nd6 18. d5 Ne4
In my opinion black have forced loss even if they defend perfectly,however nobody plays perfectly :)
I'm ready to play some)
Engine assisted casual correspondence games should be played between strong players in this line. This could shed some light on how sound this defense is. I'm both not strong enough and have other thi
Well, SF claims 22. c6 was winning... +6 is not an eval typical for pawnitizited bishop. TBH, the analysis of this game only makes me more certain that this line (on move 10) wins. OK, it might be a d