- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

HMVC 2021 Pairings and Results

@Stubenfisch
vs
@marvochan
Playing right now!
6.5-2.5
And I leave
Stubenfisch wins
Do I have next round to play?
Last game

https://lichess.org/3aQgLj2b1mKl

@Stubenfisch vs @marvochan Playing right now! 6.5-2.5 And I leave Stubenfisch wins Do I have next round to play? Last game https://lichess.org/3aQgLj2b1mKl

Unexpectedly, due to multipliers , I lost the second round.
I was promoted to Losers Round 2 I think but when I checked , mine match was against the opponent in Losers Round 1 at the starting block one.
I want to ask @Sinamon73 to correct me that am I playing with the correct opponent........?
Too , we both opponents have decided Atomic as the variants to be played .
Time :- Not decided yet

Unexpectedly, due to *multipliers* , I lost the second round. I was promoted to Losers Round 2 I think but when I checked , mine match was against the opponent in Losers Round 1 at the starting block one. I want to ask @Sinamon73 to correct me that am I playing with the correct opponent........? Too , we both opponents have decided Atomic as the variants to be played . Time :- Not decided yet

catask 3 - borntowinchess 1 (21-2 with multipliers), borntowinchess forfeited the remaining games.

catask 3 - borntowinchess 1 (21-2 with multipliers), borntowinchess forfeited the remaining games.

Legion 5 - variantbunny 5 (25 - 15 with multipliers), variantbunny forfeited the remaining games.

Legion 5 - variantbunny 5 (25 - 15 with multipliers), variantbunny forfeited the remaining games.

@pepellou vs @madnutella

1-5 for MadNutella in 3+
5-1 for pepellou in zh

After multipliers: 36-24 pepellou wins

@pepellou vs @madnutella 1-5 for MadNutella in 3+ 5-1 for pepellou in zh After multipliers: 36-24 pepellou wins

Yes, your pairing as seen in the challonge bracket is correct. Please don't play it before the next round starts.

Yes, your pairing as seen in the challonge bracket is correct. Please don't play it before the next round starts.

I got absolutely crushed by @VariantsOnly, as expected. I did take a game off him for the first time in a long while, and not in the variant where I thought I would be more likely to do so (Perhaps I didn't deserve to win the game in question, but perhaps I didn't deserve to lose at least one of the first set. Live and learn...).

RK: MC 0-6 VO closest game (?)

https://lichess.org/93qdjrYVRcyn

3+: MC 1-5 VO closest game (?)
https://lichess.org/6lyALnRN

By my calculations that makes the overall score MC 5-77 VO

Most importantly: GGS!

I got absolutely crushed by @VariantsOnly, as expected. I did take a game off him for the first time in a long while, and not in the variant where I thought I would be more likely to do so (Perhaps I didn't deserve to win the game in question, but perhaps I didn't deserve to lose at least one of the first set. Live and learn...). RK: MC 0-6 VO closest game (?) https://lichess.org/93qdjrYVRcyn 3+: MC 1-5 VO closest game (?) https://lichess.org/6lyALnRN By my calculations that makes the overall score MC 5-77 VO Most importantly: GGS!

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.