Search "user:huangyudong"

@MooseOnE4 said in #28: ..... I don't have much of a trouble with you using deepseek. But I don't understand what you are trying to say, didn't deepseek just answered no to my third question?

@Cieron said in #26: > Maybe quantum computers in the future could "brute force solve" chess. iirc, 3Blue1Brown notes that time complexity only gets reduced to O(sqrt(n)) for quantum computing, though…

@MooseOnE4 said in #22: > But I proved ? So basically I won the challenge But I proved you wrong? @MooseOnE4 said in #25: > Computers that we had are good enough but not strong enough till now we need…

Replying to #1: Mind clarifying what you mean by "complex"? As far as I know, the axioms of mathematics aren't any complicated than the rules of chess. But when it comes to computation. it's easy to c…

https://lichess.org/11hYpg5t/white Not a very exciting game, but one of the few games I played without terrible blunders from both side :-P

@Damkiller25 said in #20: > Even if you had all required information, would you be able to understand logically why it is true? For majority a defintion for derivative is hard to understand. Massive a…

@huangyudong 6-0 @AnandDeepu First game: https://lichess.org/NLSe6MGf

@huangyudong vs @AnandDeepu will be play on 27th January at 11:30 AM UTC

@The_Cricketer said in #91: > @The_Cricketer Vs @huangyudong is scheduled for 18th January 5:30 Am UTC Didn't we agreed to play on Sunday(19th of January) at 5:30 AM UTC instead of today?

@huangyudong 6-0 @AshaneStNicholas first game: https://lichess.org/rvytQiz4FHZG