Off-Topic Discussion - difference is power#2 So, assume a problem is reduced to answering 10 yes-or-no-questions. Randomly answering them without any knowledge would get 5 out of 10 correct "on average". Say, an expert calculates rather deeply a… | NewtOrange |
Off-Topic Discussion - Is moral subjective or objective#10 @sdkman said in #9: I ask what do you think about abortion I don't know about the tablebase solution for abortions, but here is what I have worked out: The involved parties are the "pregnant women" an… | NewtOrange |
Off-Topic Discussion - Is moral subjective or objective#8 Forget about morality! Generally speaking, morality is a set of rules people are supposed to follow. But such a set of rules does not necessarily have the people's best interest at heart. Take some re… | NewtOrange |
Off-Topic Discussion - Terrorist assault/war against Israel.#79 @sdkman said in #3: > what you call terror*sm, i call it self defence personally because we see what Palestinians have to endure daily because of colonialism I enjoyed our friendly chatter and you pla… | NewtOrange |
General Chess Discussion - Discord?#2 it's such a nice idea, it's not common place on the few discord servers i am on, so i browsed a bit through the teams and The_Chess_Academy seems to have the most promising voice channels and quite th… | NewtOrange |
Off-Topic Discussion - 4D chess#7 no, you need less than 3^n - 1 pawns to surround the king on a n-dimensional chessboard. u place yourself in the corner, surround yourself with pawns - in 4d that makes 15 pawns- and state "i am outsi… | NewtOrange |
Off-Topic Discussion - What book influenced your worldview?#6 the three little pigs - i think my mom read it to me when i was in kindergarten, it had all these nice colourful drawings | NewtOrange |
General Chess Discussion - Interpretation of evaluation: The probabilistic truth engines don't want you to know#17 @kajalmaya said in #15: > This is wrong. The number has nothing to do with probability of winning. It is meant for internal use of the engine, [...] > > It is us who are now showing these evaluations … | NewtOrange |
General Chess Discussion - Interpretation of evaluation: The probabilistic truth engines don't want you to know#13 @Sarg0n said in #10: > Two remarks: > > -a big number which doesn't change means nothing. It's a 0.00 basically. A position is only good when it can be improved. > -when several moves yield the same e… | NewtOrange |
General Chess Discussion - Interpretation of evaluation: The probabilistic truth engines don't want you to know#12 @Sarg0n said in #11: > Generally, a position can only be won or a draw. Any number for a won position is arbitrary. The number is not arbitrary, it is a measure of how certain the engine is, that the … | NewtOrange |
Next |
---|