@mkubecek said in #9:
> 75% opening, 60.4% middlegame, 75.5% endgame; I guess having most problem in middlegames is not really surprising and certainly it's something I need to work on. What is a bit surprising that by variant, I get 69.6% in classical and 71.4% in rapid but that's probably just a result of rapid providing rather small sample.
>
>
> Training puzzles and game practice, preferrably in longer time controls that actually allow you to calculate and look for tactical stuff. Once you get better at spotting the patterns and opportunities, you'll be able to use it in shorter time controls as well.
>
>
> It's one of the results shown after clicking on "Chess Insights" link in your profile page.
I think you are right, playing in the longer time, helps us to identify tactics.
I will try that.
Thanks for your advice, i will let you know after a month or so, by playing longer games and try to improve it. Let's see what happens.
> 75% opening, 60.4% middlegame, 75.5% endgame; I guess having most problem in middlegames is not really surprising and certainly it's something I need to work on. What is a bit surprising that by variant, I get 69.6% in classical and 71.4% in rapid but that's probably just a result of rapid providing rather small sample.
>
>
> Training puzzles and game practice, preferrably in longer time controls that actually allow you to calculate and look for tactical stuff. Once you get better at spotting the patterns and opportunities, you'll be able to use it in shorter time controls as well.
>
>
> It's one of the results shown after clicking on "Chess Insights" link in your profile page.
I think you are right, playing in the longer time, helps us to identify tactics.
I will try that.
Thanks for your advice, i will let you know after a month or so, by playing longer games and try to improve it. Let's see what happens.