@Toscani re: #20
I feel good because none of the openings I consider essential are listed :P
I think that deviating from the 'norm' in opening study can produce benefits beyond the obvious.
Cheers!
MR
EDIT:
You know, on further review of this thread, I think you're committing a fundamental error: You're tying your ego to your chess skill. Skill at chess shows exactly one thing about a person: how skilled they are at chess. A game, a diversion, a pastime, a fun distraction. Not a career, not a decisive indicator of worth or value, not anything but what it says about itself. Such a self-referential yardstick is only accurate in one metric. Please do not fall into the trap of letting your chess results determine how you measure your self-worth. In the real world, no one cares about your chess. There are other metrics, other determinants that people use to judge others. Many other metrics.
I guess I am saying that to berate yourself over your chess skill, or perceived lack thereof, is pointless in the end, even where your chess is concerned. Enjoy it for what it is: a board game that contains the potential for beauty. Not a yardstick to beat yourself with. You will improve by playing and studying. Maybe not at the speed you would prefer, but you will.
Cheers Toscani, you're a good person regardless.
MR