@play_abc said in #10:
> i honestly read your article and can not understand what you trying to say.. ?!
Well in a nutshell it is about trying to follow your own agenda on the chessboard and minimize being reactive to the opponent's threats or the need for automatic moves like recaptures. Does this help maybe? Also, check the examples to reinforce the idea here.
It is about trying to be more "open-minded" on the chess board and trying to say "NO!" more to the apparently "Have to do this..." moments. You often don't have to parry a threat or recapture. Those are often big turning point opportunities in games if you check with engines after - often they are the very moments that are great opportunities for you.
> i honestly read your article and can not understand what you trying to say.. ?!
Well in a nutshell it is about trying to follow your own agenda on the chessboard and minimize being reactive to the opponent's threats or the need for automatic moves like recaptures. Does this help maybe? Also, check the examples to reinforce the idea here.
It is about trying to be more "open-minded" on the chess board and trying to say "NO!" more to the apparently "Have to do this..." moments. You often don't have to parry a threat or recapture. Those are often big turning point opportunities in games if you check with engines after - often they are the very moments that are great opportunities for you.