Hi
after the game and computer analysis I get a text with moves and comments. Books (off screen) often describes variations and at the end it says, and white is winning or +- or similar.
Here at Lichess I get for example:
“ 12.Qg4?!Inaccuracy. Qd3 was best “
A possible improvement would be to add the evaluation of the position at the end. Something like:
12.Qg4?!Inaccuracy. Qd3 was best (+1.8).
The evaluation should be a handy variable to the developer since he/she knows that Qd3 is the best move.
after the game and computer analysis I get a text with moves and comments. Books (off screen) often describes variations and at the end it says, and white is winning or +- or similar.
Here at Lichess I get for example:
“ 12.Qg4?!Inaccuracy. Qd3 was best “
A possible improvement would be to add the evaluation of the position at the end. Something like:
12.Qg4?!Inaccuracy. Qd3 was best (+1.8).
The evaluation should be a handy variable to the developer since he/she knows that Qd3 is the best move.