Annoying Players in chess

People accuse you of cheating when you outplay them. I have been accused of cheating so many times i take it as a compliment lol

@en1ightened Well they should at least look at the analysis before accusing someone. I do it like this: When i find my opponent suspicious, i look at the analysis at the end. If there are 0 inaccuracy, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, i look at his profile if he often plays games like this. If he does, i will report him.

Also i have a good possibility to identify a cheater during the game. If i think he cheats and i am in a bad position already, I do a simple blunder on porpuse. Just blundering my queen or rook for example. Or blundering an easy mate in 1. If he does not immediately play the move, they are probably cheating because they type the move in their engine.

that doesn't mean anything. If you are calculating a very long line, it can take some time to find an obvious blunder. It can even happen in OTB chess. I agree that cheaters will more likely take more time to find the obvious move but still. And what I don't understand, is why cheaters are not 2600+
I'm rated 2280 in classical (even though I cheated) but was rated 1961 rapid, 1904 blitz and 1620 bullet

I find it annoying when people resign for no reason.

Why?maybe there in a hurry

I want to actually beat them

I also find it annoying when people resign one move before checkmate

Me too

And when people know there gonna lose and then they just offer draws the whole time or just do nothing and run out of time instead.

I heard @braunegefahr mention that there is a cheaters mark. Is there? And where? Just want to know.