@philodendron68 said in #1:
> Why have the rating graphs been modified that are older than two years? They are extremely inaccurate now and even ugly. Many rating peaks and downs are completely abolished. Could that be undone?
no, it takes to reAnalyse dozens of games, You know, that analyses takes resourses, that's why they are restricted( 30 per day I think), even 2 years ago games, there was strong enough engines to see main mistakes, actually they were quite good even then. of course today engines surpasses them very much, but even 2 years ago engine is enough to study. so why not to pay your ofwn efforts, instead of critizising "old" engines, which non of Humans could beat even then?Besides very less human watch 2 years old games. if You want to reAnalyse them, it's very simpe to do- dowload all their moves from here, then reupload them here, as a New Imported Game, and Analyse It with current Engine
> Why have the rating graphs been modified that are older than two years? They are extremely inaccurate now and even ugly. Many rating peaks and downs are completely abolished. Could that be undone?
no, it takes to reAnalyse dozens of games, You know, that analyses takes resourses, that's why they are restricted( 30 per day I think), even 2 years ago games, there was strong enough engines to see main mistakes, actually they were quite good even then. of course today engines surpasses them very much, but even 2 years ago engine is enough to study. so why not to pay your ofwn efforts, instead of critizising "old" engines, which non of Humans could beat even then?Besides very less human watch 2 years old games. if You want to reAnalyse them, it's very simpe to do- dowload all their moves from here, then reupload them here, as a New Imported Game, and Analyse It with current Engine