Suddenly, They Have So Little To Say

@Nomoreusernames said in #36:
> Schrottdinger, you said VTWood wasn't a lawyer, but he is. Instead of taking account of your mistake, reassessing your opinion and apologising, you thought that calling VTWood names would help make it true, but it doesn't and it can't, facts are facts, and you have lied to everyone. Now say sorry to VTWood like a big boy.

I have nothing to apologize for, and there is no proof one way or another that @VTWood is a lawyer beyond he says he is. If he is willing to doxx himself to win an internet argument then he is really quite stupid, so I don't expect that to happen. You are missing the point of what I am saying entirely. What mistake have I made? What facts have been proven here? You may be willing to take what some random internet person says at face value, but I am not. I get the sense from the tone and content of his posts that he is a blowhard and not someone to take seriously, regardless of whether he is or is not a lawyer. That is my opinion, and there is nothing to apologize for.

Seems to have an Integrity problem:

cyclingtips.com/2022/10/chess-outcast-hans-niemann-says-he-was-a-top-cyclist-was-he-really/

@WO_Schrodinger said in #11:
>@VTWood you are not a lawyer but you really like to present yourself like one.

@VTWood said in #13:
>Actually, I am an attorney and a member of both a state and Federal bar. Where do you practice law?

@Nomoreusernames said in #28:
>You didn't answer the question, you called out @VTWood, he responded and asked you in kind...So what kind of person are you?

>@WO_Schrodinger :#33
>I shared my opinion that @VTWood seems more like a bogstandard internet blowhard than a serious lawyer

@Nomoreusernames said in #36:
> Schrottdinger, you said VTWood wasn't a lawyer, but he is. Instead of taking account of your mistake, reassessing your opinion and apologising, you thought that calling VTWood names would help make it true, but it doesn't and it can't, facts are facts, and you have lied to everyone. Now say sorry to VTWood like a big boy.

@WO_Schrodinger said in #41:
> I have nothing to apologize for, and there is no proof one way or another that @VTWood is a lawyer beyond he says he is.
You made the claim, it's your job to prove it. Now come on, where are your manners? Apologise to VTWood, you're not a big boy unless you can say sorry when you're wrong.

Rofl literally incendiary ad hominem in the post replying to yours, dear @Nomoreusernames.

Someone tell Carlsen cheating is not okay. <3

I got cursed out like 8 times from tryan82, but then he came around and sort of made an apology post and left the site.

To make good progress, don't insult people, and don't make incendiary comments about others.

You may be angry that Carlsen, Aryan Tari and others are being calles our for their collusion, cheating, and blacklisting attempts, assault on character, and other such things but yes, do not insult others.

@Nomoreusernames said in #43:
> You made the claim, it's for you to prove. Now come on, where are your manners? Apologise to VTWood, you're not a big boy unless you can say sorry when you're wrong.

Best to not feed such low quality stalker-trolls. Ignore their wind.....they have nothing of substance to contribute to any rational discussion.

Indeed. Instead of replying to anything said, they simply attack and insult and essentially, try to inflate any negative emotion. Or instill it in the first place. Never reply in kind, and yeah keep on keeping on. Your posts are very valued and important dear friend @Nomoreusernames. You, @MidiChlorianCount, of course @VTWood, and AlexiHarvey and others are always on point and i have really never seen anything any of you said that I didn't agree with. Thank you!

@Edgy1 said in #42:
> Seems to have an Integrity problem:

You kind of expect this to be a kids fantasy, to say that you were 2nd or 3rd rated in cycling. But 8 podiums in 24 races! I wonder how the points system works, it seems that his assertion may be fact based. Do you have any idea of the points calculation system for cycling Egdy1?

In order to know if Hans was a 'top racer' one needs to know if any other rider finished in the top 3 in 1/3 of their races.
Then one has to decide what 'top racer' means to them
then one has to figure out what Hans meant by 'top racer'.

Personally it seems to be a bunch of effort for no purpose.

@LegendaryQueen said in #40:
>
Yes the big takeaway for me. Is that the general consensus among all the lawyers on youtube is that he can appeal on jurisdiction. But noone has actually said that Neiman doesn't have a case against him. The best they can say besdies jurisdiction is that he walked the line, but its obvious only a trial will determine if he crossed it. A couple lawyers said anti slap laws might prevent him from refiling. But I'm pretty sure they can still change that before they go through with the suit. And they also haven't said exactly which states have those laws. Not all of them do. It would be foolish for Naka to think he has nothing to worry about. Either way, Neiman already zipped everybody's lips with his suit so its already a win.