www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/5FEEzohikv i'm not trying to promote any chess website, and my friend sent me this.
idk who would spend so much time finding this.
idk who would spend so much time finding this.
Yes but this can't happen in a real game because of the repetition. Still, it's quite cool.
Nice!
Thats cool, the engine stops marking the moves as brilliant after 47 for some reason, but that's really interesting!
I really don't understand the concept of accuracy (I have seen 2000+ rated players with 20 accuracy and 1000 rated player with 90+ accuracy) and brilliant moves in chess com. How does the move keep being brilliant after 40+ repetitions ??
@LearningToMove I had two brilliant moves in a row once in a game that I still lost. It was a losing endgame and my oponent made a blunder, which give me an oportunity to draw. When there has only one move that holds the position, I think it's probably the most commom cenarios to brillant moves.
Accuracy in the other hand is calculated by the amount of moves that you make that are the choice of the engine too. In many begginners games what happens is that someone blunders pretty quickly in the opening and the whole game goes for simplification followed up by a winning endgame and both players make good moves for the most part of it (except the blunder).
And because one side has clear advantage is very easy to spot the best moves. In higher rated games what usually happens is, because neither players blunders to the openings, they have really really complex middle games and chaotic positions with a lot of tatics, which in blitz could be missplayied even by GM's.
Accuracy in the other hand is calculated by the amount of moves that you make that are the choice of the engine too. In many begginners games what happens is that someone blunders pretty quickly in the opening and the whole game goes for simplification followed up by a winning endgame and both players make good moves for the most part of it (except the blunder).
And because one side has clear advantage is very easy to spot the best moves. In higher rated games what usually happens is, because neither players blunders to the openings, they have really really complex middle games and chaotic positions with a lot of tatics, which in blitz could be missplayied even by GM's.
you could say Cool study; now start working on some more complicated endgames; and find brilliant moves to hold the draw or sth.
@ValerieRu said in #1:
> www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/5FEEzohikv i'm not trying to promote any chess website, and my friend sent me this.
> idk who would spend so much time finding this.
i cant open this link!
> www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/5FEEzohikv i'm not trying to promote any chess website, and my friend sent me this.
> idk who would spend so much time finding this.
i cant open this link!
@ValerieRu said in #1:
> www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/5FEEzohikv i'm not trying to promote any chess website, and my friend sent me this.
> idk who would spend so much time finding this.
I found that position as an example of these words things on a YouTube video
> www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/5FEEzohikv i'm not trying to promote any chess website, and my friend sent me this.
> idk who would spend so much time finding this.
I found that position as an example of these words things on a YouTube video
@Martin_1001
I have compared the games with 99+ accuracy there with the engine but I don't see top engine move being played. It may be because of their older version of stockfish but Lichess' engine doesn't agree to 99+% accuracy.
Also, for brilliant moves, can anyone agree these moves are brilliant? They may be best moves according to the engine but brilliant moves till 47th repetition is absurd, don't you think? Maybe the meaning of brilliant is different from what I am thinking.
I have compared the games with 99+ accuracy there with the engine but I don't see top engine move being played. It may be because of their older version of stockfish but Lichess' engine doesn't agree to 99+% accuracy.
Also, for brilliant moves, can anyone agree these moves are brilliant? They may be best moves according to the engine but brilliant moves till 47th repetition is absurd, don't you think? Maybe the meaning of brilliant is different from what I am thinking.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.