...that my play was as accurate here. Some nice tactics here to learn from, making the best of your opponents errors. Instructive at best.
Here's another, 0-0-0. I think now after 21 years of training, I'm going to start playing for the official FIDE rating next year.
Surprised by your own "accuracy"...hmm.
@MrPushwood
Yes, the pieces where jumping about, I really expected at least an error somewhere. Don't mistake the quote to mean I don't have faith in my play, only that the computer surprised me.
Yes, the pieces where jumping about, I really expected at least an error somewhere. Don't mistake the quote to mean I don't have faith in my play, only that the computer surprised me.
@GunPowderKing said in #4:
> @MrPushwood
>
> Yes, the pieces where jumping about, I really expected at least an error somewhere. Don't mistake the quote to mean I don't have faith in my play, only that the computer surprised me.
Hmm... If you've had 21 years of training and are surprised by your own accuracy, but are planning on "playing for the official FIDE rating next year," something doesn't add up.
> @MrPushwood
>
> Yes, the pieces where jumping about, I really expected at least an error somewhere. Don't mistake the quote to mean I don't have faith in my play, only that the computer surprised me.
Hmm... If you've had 21 years of training and are surprised by your own accuracy, but are planning on "playing for the official FIDE rating next year," something doesn't add up.
@MrPushwood
You're clearly overthinking this. I'm always surprised to play a computer accurate game because I am a human.
You're clearly overthinking this. I'm always surprised to play a computer accurate game because I am a human.
@GunPowderKing said in #6:
> I am a human.
Exactly!
You are human and no computer.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are facing a human player.
You should be proud of ideas like tactics that came/could arose in game instead of just a number called accuracy.
> I am a human.
Exactly!
You are human and no computer.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are facing a human player.
You should be proud of ideas like tactics that came/could arose in game instead of just a number called accuracy.
Wrll accuracy does matter against humans, its how we win. Thank you though, I am a bit proud, but never short of human surprisement of games accurate to the point we can play like computers.
@Akbar2thegreat
@Akbar2thegreat
@GunPowderKing said in #8:
> Wrll accuracy does matter against humans, its how we win.
I meant that humans don't think about accuracy while playing rather they play naturally with a clear mind and fixed goal. The motive is to play better than opponent. It's not race against computer (after all accuracy is with respect to computers only).
> Wrll accuracy does matter against humans, its how we win.
I meant that humans don't think about accuracy while playing rather they play naturally with a clear mind and fixed goal. The motive is to play better than opponent. It's not race against computer (after all accuracy is with respect to computers only).
@GunPowderKing
I have noticed when my opponents make bad moves my accuracy scores improve ... I wonder if that works the same way for other players too ?
I have noticed when my opponents make bad moves my accuracy scores improve ... I wonder if that works the same way for other players too ?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.