Mega-cool tactical opening in 3 check

I finally got to play one of the coolest trick openings in 3 check! How can you not love 3 check with mega-cool mayhem like this in the opening? It's so rare that only Fairygirl has played it in the opening database, and she was marked for artificially increasing/decreasing her rating, so I am the only legitimate theoretician who's played it. It looks a bit mad :D But it's zero inaccuracies, zero mistakes and zero blunders :)

If he takes the bishop with his king white is +34 (actually mate in 9) with Knight d5 check. Don't have the mate in 9 memorized, but +34 is good enough :) His best move is d5, and I play another mega-cool sac, knight to f4 (+6)!! The hilarious thing is my opponent was auto-resigned for cheating :D When I had played a perfect game and he had blundered once :D I knew the moves by memory, he knew them because he saw them on an analysis board :D

First of all, this belongs to the game analysis thread. Second, dont public shame people. You public shamed your opponent and the other person you mentioned.

Stop being a fool. I am attempting to start a convo about an opening (and thereby promote the excitement of 3 check), not about one game. You might as well complain about someone discussing the French Defence in General Chess Discussion. My intention was not to shame my opponent, but to share a moment of chess joy. And I simply stated a fact, in passing: that he was auto-resigned for cheating. That the fact may shame him is a situation he created. Is it against forum rules to refer by name to an over the board tournament player being banned for cheating with secret signals from an accomplice? To refer to reality? Of course not.
Take your censorious pomposity elsewhere. This is a fun forum.

Uhh why does it say cheat detected? Who cheated in that game?

My opponent, playing black

Oh- too bad he cheated it would've been nice to finish that game-

Ye :) I have waited maybe 4 months to play this opening :p

@Aceno0b

"Fairygirl has played it in the opening database, and she was marked for artificially increasing/decreasing her rating, so I am the only legitimate theoretician who's played it"

If you just wanted to show the opening, this information is unnecessary. So its a clear case of public shaming.

"I knew the moves by memory, he knew them because he saw them on an analysis board :D"

Here you are accusing him of something you cant prove. Did you see him looking at the analysis board? No. Dont you know this "cheat detected" thing always comes up, when someone has an analysis board open in another tab, also if he does not use it? It also can happen that he had analyzed a finished game, then forgot to close the tab and the system "detected it" while he played against you. This happened to a lot of people who just forgot to close the tab.

We don't know the lichess methods of cheat detection. I read that the analysis board must feature not just the current position of the game you are playing, but at least one other variation of your game. If lichess are confident enough to declare that he cheated, I see no reason to doubt that. Of course mistakes will be made on rare occasions, but they are EXTREMELY rare.
You quote me: "Fairygirl has played it in the opening database, and she was marked for artificially increasing/decreasing her rating, so I am the only legitimate theoretician who's played it." And you comment: "If you just wanted to show the opening, this information is unnecessary. So its a clear case of public shaming."
I wanted to take the credit for my hours and hours and hours of hard work, I'm not ashamed of that. Is it so horribly wrong to mention that I am the only legitimate player to EVER have played this opening?

I think Ace(my best friend) and braunegefahr are fighting by keyboard hahahahahahahahaha