@radicalnonsense Not sure if you've taken an English class before but you must not know what a hyperbole is. If you notice, no one is backing you up here and you'll just have to deal with the fact that these are the rules. Or you can keep complaining.
Flamo you have such a lack of interest in development. would you like a game?
This "development" you propose has no benefits at all. Playing a game has nothing to do with this.
that is a nice example from Sarg0n that you can win games with the king and knight by checkmate if there is another piece. It is not the same game that I had asked for clarification on so i am grateful for a useful example which does not require ridiculous moves. thanks for the lesson. Perhaps i need to move my other comment to a different thread heading; the point is no longer that you cant win with only a knight (and king) but if time is so important surely you can't claim a win if it is outside the realm of technical and human capability to do so, and thus i think someone should offer backing to my idea on this site, which is a great site and doesnt have as many asholes as some other sites that i could mention. FlamoToolz you are the exception...
Like how you’re using vulgar language in a site that strongly prohibits it. I would like to hear what I said that makes me so bad. Swear all you want. I’ll take it.
Maybe you’re right. Maybe some people support you. This just isn’t the site.
welp rules are rules get over it
ok, so my final comment. sad that no-one wants to be brave enough to support my great idea on this site, i think that you are all just computers incapable of changing your programming for the sake of a better world. sad lack of imagination from the chess geeks so far. They are happy with their illogical rules in their game of logic. the irony will be lost on them too. lol.
#38 You're at least the fourth person to have suggested #12, but given that even I imagined it I wouldn't call it an especially creative idea.
@radicalnonsense
>calling people who don't want to change the rules of a game "cowards" when the rule change has no point at all
>Hating on bullet chess since starting of this thread
>Claiming people who don't want a rule change lack creativity
>Calling chess rules illogical
You went too far to be taken seriously.
>calling people who don't want to change the rules of a game "cowards" when the rule change has no point at all
>Hating on bullet chess since starting of this thread
>Claiming people who don't want a rule change lack creativity
>Calling chess rules illogical
You went too far to be taken seriously.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.