I need a playing partner for rapid on chess.com

@Buttercup22 said in #30:
> If you think I'd actually play games in the cheater's pool you are even a bigger fool than you first appeared which is saying a lot.

6 months ago.

@Mystic-Dragon said in #31:
> If you think I didn't look at your games before typing this you must assume I am a blind fool
That description seems about right to me since if you weren't that you would be able to see I played 3 games in the last year on this account, about the amount you'd expect that would be caused from forgetting to log out of this account before I played a game or being on the computer when drunk. Nice detective work, slick.

I suppose unrated games against other TOS violators would get very boring

@Mystic-Dragon said in #33:
> I suppose unrated games against other TOS violators would get very boring
Yes it would, very much like having a conversation with someone like you. That's why I don't play in the cheater's pool. Sorry to burst your bubble.

responding to you is very tiring i'll just leave it at at worst you cheated via engine and at best you sandbagged. or you can deny that you did nothing wrong and that lichess and their cheat detection needs reevaluation.

sandbagging is illegal for a reason.

@Mystic-Dragon said in #35:
> responding to you is very tiring i'll just leave it at at worst you cheated via engine and at best you sandbagged. or you can deny that you did nothing wrong and that lichess and their cheat detection needs reevaluation.
>
> sandbagging is illegal for a reason.
It does, it needs a complete reevaluation including the option to add the ability to select beginner intermediate or advanced category for yourself like chess com does so that when you're setting up an account for a complete beginner you don't have to lose several games in a row to get their rating to an appropriate level for them to start playing at. Not my fault there is this deficiency in lichess design.
Now since you are getting "very tired" run away. Because since you were cowardly at not defending your original criticism of lichess that started this argument I'll also expect you to run away from arguments you are losing.

@Mystic-Dragon you're just jealous ur not good as a 900 rapid such as mr buttercup

@d4nf6bg50-1 said in #37:
> @Mystic-Dragon you're just jealous ur not good as a 900 rapid such as mr buttercup

don't we all?

i can be,

and btw pls join my new study

https :// lichess.org/ study/ vv8ppX7c

and press view on lichess for more chapters

@d4nf6bg50-1 said in #37:
> @Mystic-Dragon you're just jealous ur not good as a 900 rapid such as mr buttercup
He's not just jealous he's also a coward. Because he criticized "lichess playing style" a long time ago and all this smoke and mirrors of attacking me has been to distract from me simply asking him to explain that You should learn to be a man and stand behind what you say.