@shiningstar12345 said in #3:
> Its like a way of saying most satisfyingly or nicest
it's a jooooooooke
> Its like a way of saying most satisfyingly or nicest
it's a jooooooooke
Nice.
@MilesW123 said in #9:
> likely not the best game you had. also, that is the meaning of calling your opponent a noob and boasting your win.
Really? The opponents rapid rating is in the 1600s
> likely not the best game you had. also, that is the meaning of calling your opponent a noob and boasting your win.
Really? The opponents rapid rating is in the 1600s
You were ~150 higher rated than your opponent so you were expected to win.
You didn't blunder your queen, your lower rated opponent won your queen with a nice tactic. props to them, so give them props. Don't downplay your opponents tactic it by phrasing it as your blunder.
Publicly celebrating a win over a lower rated opponent? eh. I don't think it's necessary, but, more care and thought should be given if doing it publicly. Give your opponent props where props are due, and, thank you opponent for the interesting game and taking on the challenge of playing a higher rated opponent.
You didn't blunder your queen, your lower rated opponent won your queen with a nice tactic. props to them, so give them props. Don't downplay your opponents tactic it by phrasing it as your blunder.
Publicly celebrating a win over a lower rated opponent? eh. I don't think it's necessary, but, more care and thought should be given if doing it publicly. Give your opponent props where props are due, and, thank you opponent for the interesting game and taking on the challenge of playing a higher rated opponent.
Also, blundering your queen at 1800 is not optimal, maybe focus more on the game next time lol
bad game but managed to pull it off. congrats!
<Comment deleted by user>
that's dirty!
;-)
;-)
he could just simplify in the very end by taking rook and B and it should still be winning (R+B vs 2N), but somehow he didnt realize his K is completely locked down... it was too subtle and sneaky play by you, not even a GM couldve seen this coming :P
@Zxxwins said in #1:
> Note how i blundered my Queen and still managed to deliver this elite checkmate
"elite"? seems pretty normal to me. your opponent was lower rated by that much and you still lost your queen due to a nice tactic on their part and you call yourself elite?
On another note, why is this in the general chess discussion?
> Note how i blundered my Queen and still managed to deliver this elite checkmate
"elite"? seems pretty normal to me. your opponent was lower rated by that much and you still lost your queen due to a nice tactic on their part and you call yourself elite?
On another note, why is this in the general chess discussion?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.