@odoaker2015 said in #8:
> Why would the article mention his Lichess account?
It doesn't have to, of course. The point is that there is no link from either side between the lichess account and the article. Only you refering to both and claiming it's the same person.
> The first name Wolf is also in the account profile.
Rather common first names in Germany, isn't it?
> That and the article should be enough to close the account.
Definitely not.
> And it is obvious why the account should be closed. The owner died.
We still only have your word for that. And even if moderators knew for sure, why would such account have to be closed? Wouldn't disabling login suffice? Why should the account's history and (potentially) all contents created disappear?
> The account has been dormant since November and has not been used since.
There are accounts that have been inactive for years and then the users started using them again.
> The account also gets followers.
One random follower in 8 months since last activity. And even if there were more, why would that be a problem?