To be clear- again- the only person to have cheated within years is Carlsen. Who then laughs and laughs when it happens. Do you think that someone who laughs when they do something wrong is better?
There is not much thought that goes into the attacks, it is pretty much the definition of thoughtlessness.
@Nomoreusernames, as difficult as it may be, the best course of action is to not engage with them as much as possible, and allow the moderators to take care of any infractions, which they do.
Even for me to tell the other guy, that his attacking
@VTWood, who, is by the way, clearly telling the truth -- continued ad hominems etc. etc., in refusal to discuss, is against the rules, i.e., if I corrected him even this would be against the rules.
Wrong as what he and those on his side continue to do and embody, letting the mods do their thing is the only and best recourse.
Even if it takes time, it is still the most effective.
All of that is designed for several things, simplicity, reduce animosity or at least attacks, so on and so forth.
In any case, the main issue is really that Carlsen's statement of actions is:
"It is okay when I cheat." (Verbal acknowledgement followed by a minute + of laughter)
"If others win against me, should I so choose, I am allowed to insinuate, accuse, and attempt to blacklist them as much as I please."
Clearly these are exceedingly mature forms of the same thing when he rages, refuses to glance at the opponent, curses, etc. when he loses. Collusion and cheating are serious issues but seriously? If this has not shown that the greater problem is not the animosity/hatred that reckless and unhinged selfish behavior creates, then keep evaluating.
In any case, Grandmaster Niemann's response to what many or all clearly recognize as "fighting words," is with a lawsuit, so I guess or hope we can see some recourse.
