lichess.org
Donate

Lost to a 1200 player -_-

@Legobuilder101 The replies are embarrassing because they're not answering OPs question, they're trying to make him feel better and safe and blah blah. He sucks at chess, just tell him outright.

Or try and justify why you think he's good. If anyone can say that, with reasons, I will pay them £1000 for doing the impossible.
@ShootingStar34 Lol the guy is being brutally honest everyone has a right to a point of view albeit using nicer language, that said, that game was painful to watch and to think its classical, if it was bullet maybe.Advise to author try playing proper chess, develop, castle then attack and maybe such things wont happen in the future iregardless of the level of your opponent.I always resist such quick punishment of opening errors against lower rated players especially after watching Carlsen play 1500 rated players, you would think since he is over 3000 he would go for quick checkmate but no.He develops, castles then attacks just like he's playing a super GM so why me a 1800 would want to deliver a quick checkmate.
dude it happened to me lost against a 800 1 year ago but i improved and then 1 year later i beat a 2300 in 6 moves so i say practice more chess and become better also say that @CrassJack is totally wrong
@kidneybrain I don't see how I'm wrong, no one's given any reason why I'm wrong. If you're a 1600+ and you lose to a 1200 rated player then I have to wonder how you got to 1600 in the first place. especially if you chose to play against him for an easy win like OP said he did
@Sixers What can I say? I hate bullshit and bullshitters. And there's a lot of both here
Bullet and shorter time controls dont matter, the lower the time the more likely you will lose against someone significantly lower rated. The game below is a fine example.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.