@SmaragdElefant said in #32:
>
@DailyInsanity :
>
> I am sorry. All I tried to say was:
>
> I was impressed. I read 2 parts and there was something - not information - but something that kept me curious and got my attention. You are great in rhetorics.
>
> But I don't think that it is helpful, at least not for me.
>
> I am not a native speaker. But is cheeky the correct word? People don't call me cheeky, they call me frank. But I am not a native speaker. It is possible that I do accidently mistakes in English.
>
> At least you understood one "cheeky line" wrong:
>
> This "... if I will do in the next part." ... That was not about "if you will write it" or not. It was about "if there will be information" or not. I am sorry, My conclusion: It isn't helpful for me so it isn't helpful for anyone is wrong and not friendly.
Yes you're right - 'cheeky' in this context is quite a charitable interpretation for 'rude' (which is different from 'frank' by the way - although those that gleefully pride themselves on being self-proclaimed 'brutally honest' seem to often misunderstand this).
Given your evident lack of fluency with the language, in the future you should perhaps hedge your statements when, for example, accusing someone of intentionally obfuscating for the purposes of 'advertising' etc...