The noodle is stuck on the ceiling. Did I already mention that? We want to reach the ceiling, if I gathered well over the past 5 years.
Afterthought, following, so that is the dominant theory of learning or teaching: "go fetch".
I use the "interesting move" myself all the time. Safe word.
more edit: scanning in mind for the world of Lichess internet audience in minds' ear and eyes and whatever lies beyond, the sensory experience and its recruitment thingies (where is that?
@NDpatzer? If you have an idea, sorry to ping you, but I think the subjectivity of some annotations and imposed engine point of view might be a nice interlude from human psychology).
I meant same from engine automatic graffiti. The "interesting move". Also, I use that as visual bookmark of my own theories or stories I evolve (as I learn long term) over game fragments I encounter (either my own, or, sigh, others). It helps make breadcrumb in the move list forest of moves disguised as SAN syllables.
I suggest to the op, to grow 2 personalities of game analyses. The conformist one, engine ceiling noodle abiding one (which stangely is also perpetuating another ceiling based, older theory of learning), and then the pragmatic one, only human (maybe editorializing on the engine musings, in its unspecified cloud of engine tribe above the clouds looking down upon us).
Best get another human being to stimulate your analysis by listening to your evolving patzer verbalization attempts, even if a trickle of your board thoughts; that slowing down of your thoughts will help both your own mind, cricital constructive and hopefully still having time to use imagination mind and the others to weigh in, them too with their own pragmatic every changing (hopefully improving on average, yep, there too, averaging.. but not same foggy context as Elo pools). Ok, the likely acceptable, someone at least your "level" (for example, opponent that gave you some struggling in few games, even if you level, it is likely their sub-optimal experience set related budding expertise, would have complementary skill gaps with respect to yours. ( I would agree, if you can find one for free, on account, you may not view chess as financial life line, or do not have the means or time commitment choice).
That is, if one could pull their heads from the Elo narrow obscure 1 dimensional cavity (so not really a cavity, but style has its reasons, that the reason ignore, writing fun).