Lichess rating system.

@Supertramps , beat 2000+ novices, get 2000+ yourself .
Then we will talk!

@drmrboss Ive been 2000 here. I play chess. com. This place is just warmup. Why dont you show me who´s boss? Challenge 5 min

Your answer can be seen in rating system.

Ik puzzle ratings dont really matter, but you always lose like 14 points for getting one wrong, but only gain like 7 points for getting one right. Also, it doesnt matter how close you get to solving it before getting it wrong, you will always lose points. its sorta messed up. (this is getting off topic so ill stop complaining)

today i had a game against an engine user, i have lost the game and 10 points, later he was banned and only 7 rateing points are given back to me?? i dont understand.... :/

@Supertramps repeatedly roasting himself

@AsmirS if your rating deviation was higher when you lost the points than when you got refunded that may be part of it.

For The Forum:
Also, this whole "2000s" are novices crap is crap. It only goes for some, and mainly the 2000s that strictly play lobby games or tend to play lower rated players. There are plenty of under-rated and over-rated players for all ratings and you just need to accept that.

I don't think 2000 rated players should be considered experts. I believe that in order to be called as such a player should be at least 2300 in blitz on lichess.

I also believe that anyone can have a bad day and forget openings or commit banal mistakes and lose in 9 moves.

I'm defo lower than my lichess rating. I'm around 1800 and still hang pieces.

Is there a way to see the average rating on Lichess? Could it be like the differance between FIDE and USCF ratings? I don´t understand the anomosity for my question.. Why the butthurt? There is no way im consistantly beat 2000 players here and never been close to that on chess.com. And say that the two ratingsystems are the same.