Something very weird happened while I was watching a game between a 1080 elo rated player and another player rated 1400: the game started by very inaccurate moves, and then the lower rated player found a brillant move for his level (move 8) maybe with a bit of luck, which was to castle to attack the king queen alignment with the rook. The game ended very quickly with an attack on the king and bad defence by the opponent. As the opponent couldn't believe he was beaten so badly by a so low rated player and saw that I was watching, he accused me in the private chat of giving advice which is cheating and probably reported. The ban occurred in the minute after.
You can analyse the game, there is no engine looking move, so probably lichess considered that I gave advice to the player. But how lichess can determine this given that I didn't write anything on the chat? Me I know that I didn't give any advice and that the lower rated player is somehow underrated, but it's impossible to prove this or the opposite. Maybe they detected that we were in the same place which is true, but what does it prove? I really don't understand how a so quick decision can be done for something so unprovable.
Do you have any clue on what could have happened? This is the game which resulted to a ban just after:
You can analyse the game, there is no engine looking move, so probably lichess considered that I gave advice to the player. But how lichess can determine this given that I didn't write anything on the chat? Me I know that I didn't give any advice and that the lower rated player is somehow underrated, but it's impossible to prove this or the opposite. Maybe they detected that we were in the same place which is true, but what does it prove? I really don't understand how a so quick decision can be done for something so unprovable.
Do you have any clue on what could have happened? This is the game which resulted to a ban just after: