After
@bfchessguy sternly announced that he had reached the "end of discussion," he decided to continue it.
He accuses me of being "not respectful," which may be somewhat ironic. The reason I am "not respectful," I am told, is because I had already been given the answer! And yet I continued on with the discussion, refusing to nod and be corrected as he apparently feels I should have done.
Yet I must politely insist that I have been given nothing but the view of another polite person (
@Coquelicoq, who was quite civil), not a "one true and permitted answer" that must stop all discussion and cannot be seen as anything but a refutation of my own views.
This exchange illustrates the very problem that concerns me. Some men and women apparently feel qualified to say when the "last word" has been uttered and when discussion "must end." And if one doesn't agree, and continues calmly to discuss the matter, one is denounced angrily and told that one has obvious failings, like a refusal to read! Imagine if such disgruntlement were to be given the force of law!
Actually, I have studied freedom of expression extensively, and have even addressed the matter professionally. And I continue to maintain that ideas and arguments should be rebutted with better ideas and better arguments, not cancelled and censored and stopped with threats, legal or otherwise. We learn better through debate than intimidation, I believe.
But I could be wrong, and look forward to calm and polite arguments to indicate why, if so.