I won as Black. What pawn did you think was actually poisoned?
what do you mean? there is no actually poisnoned pawns except b7
and it wouldnt really beign poisoned , if he was sharp enogh not to remove bishop from c1 to f4, allowing rook to invade.
but still Nice Game
but still Nice Game
Nice deflection of the white queen by taking the knight at the end to get the mate! FUN stuff!
A slower alternative would be 26. ... Bc2+ 27. Rxc2 Rb1+ 28. Rc1 Qd3+ 29. Qd2 Qxd2# (28. Qc1 Qd3+ 29. Rd2 Qxd2#).
And faster would be 25. ... Bf2# if I see correctly.
And faster would be 25. ... Bf2# if I see correctly.
@mkubecek said in #5:
> A slower alternative would be 26. ... Bc2+ 27. Rxc2 Rb1+ 28. Rc1 Qd3+ 29. Qd2 Qxd2# (28. Qc1 Qd3+ 29. Rd2 Qxd2#).
> And faster would be 25. ... Bf2# if I see correctly.
Yes. Magnus Carlsen and I are human. You have better odds of beating us unless you are one of us under that name. I do not multiaccount and I believe the story Magnus does not visit Lichess.org too often.
> A slower alternative would be 26. ... Bc2+ 27. Rxc2 Rb1+ 28. Rc1 Qd3+ 29. Qd2 Qxd2# (28. Qc1 Qd3+ 29. Rd2 Qxd2#).
> And faster would be 25. ... Bf2# if I see correctly.
Yes. Magnus Carlsen and I are human. You have better odds of beating us unless you are one of us under that name. I do not multiaccount and I believe the story Magnus does not visit Lichess.org too often.
@Clearchesser said in #6:
> Yes. Magnus Carlsen and I are human. You have better odds of beating us unless you are one of us under that name. I do not multiaccount and I believe the story Magnus does not visit Lichess.org too often.
No one said anything about Magnus.
> Yes. Magnus Carlsen and I are human. You have better odds of beating us unless you are one of us under that name. I do not multiaccount and I believe the story Magnus does not visit Lichess.org too often.
No one said anything about Magnus.
Human nature to want perfection in some cases. The lack of nature gives us that in this case.
@Clearchesser said in #6:
> Yes. Magnus Carlsen and I are human. You have better odds of beating us unless you are one of us under that name.
Can't say I understand what you meant here. If you wanted to indicate that I used an engine to find those lines, you are wrong.
If you feel offended by my comment #5 for whatever reason, that was not my intention and I don't see why you should. I just thought it was an interesting alternative (even if longer).
> Yes. Magnus Carlsen and I are human. You have better odds of beating us unless you are one of us under that name.
Can't say I understand what you meant here. If you wanted to indicate that I used an engine to find those lines, you are wrong.
If you feel offended by my comment #5 for whatever reason, that was not my intention and I don't see why you should. I just thought it was an interesting alternative (even if longer).
You do not need a perfect result every time to win.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.