My question, and with out going in to all the analyse I made ( if you want to read that, please look under study, I made a "block" there aboud my question.
Follow the moves:
1.d4 - d5.2.d4 - dxc4.3.Nf3 - Nf6.4.e4 - e6.5.Bxc4 - c5.6.Qe2 - a6. ( position with an isolated pawn: 6. ... - cxd4.7.exd4, - will not be considered her ) 7.dxc5 - Bxc5. ( the main position for the furman variation ) 8.0-0 - Nbd7. ( Black have many moves here eks: 8,- 0-0./b5/Qc7/Nc6. To com to the position that I have a question to,- Black most move Nbd7. ( which is an ok move by the way ) 9.e4 - b5.10.Bd3 - Bd7.11. Nbd2 !? - ... ?
So here is my question: I have study this opening for some time now, and I like the system. How ever..... According to FIDE - grandmaster Alexander Raetsky ( who is the author of, the article about this variation, in NIC ( New in chess ) yearbook nr. 44 page 188 - 216. that Black is more or less forced, to play the prophylactic move 11. ... - Be7. This is born out of page 180: 11.Nbd2: Requires circumspection from Black, wich is born out by the examples: 11. ... - 0-0 ( according to NIC ?!. But I think that Black is fin after: 12. e5 - Nd5 ( NOT Ng4 ?? ( I dear to give Ng4 a ?? Sins, I find no problems for Black after Nd5!? N ) as is in the article. Anyway. Here is my problem: I find the Bishop very good, but I can't help myself, and ask a question that say´s: WHY NOt 11. - Rc8 !? ( N)
I have testet this move in Fritz 14 - Rybka 4 - Chessmaster 10, and other chess programs, and they find NO problems with thes move.... So what do you think? Did I found a NEW idea ore just an interesting on ?!... I need help here..
thanks
Follow the moves:
1.d4 - d5.2.d4 - dxc4.3.Nf3 - Nf6.4.e4 - e6.5.Bxc4 - c5.6.Qe2 - a6. ( position with an isolated pawn: 6. ... - cxd4.7.exd4, - will not be considered her ) 7.dxc5 - Bxc5. ( the main position for the furman variation ) 8.0-0 - Nbd7. ( Black have many moves here eks: 8,- 0-0./b5/Qc7/Nc6. To com to the position that I have a question to,- Black most move Nbd7. ( which is an ok move by the way ) 9.e4 - b5.10.Bd3 - Bd7.11. Nbd2 !? - ... ?
So here is my question: I have study this opening for some time now, and I like the system. How ever..... According to FIDE - grandmaster Alexander Raetsky ( who is the author of, the article about this variation, in NIC ( New in chess ) yearbook nr. 44 page 188 - 216. that Black is more or less forced, to play the prophylactic move 11. ... - Be7. This is born out of page 180: 11.Nbd2: Requires circumspection from Black, wich is born out by the examples: 11. ... - 0-0 ( according to NIC ?!. But I think that Black is fin after: 12. e5 - Nd5 ( NOT Ng4 ?? ( I dear to give Ng4 a ?? Sins, I find no problems for Black after Nd5!? N ) as is in the article. Anyway. Here is my problem: I find the Bishop very good, but I can't help myself, and ask a question that say´s: WHY NOt 11. - Rc8 !? ( N)
I have testet this move in Fritz 14 - Rybka 4 - Chessmaster 10, and other chess programs, and they find NO problems with thes move.... So what do you think? Did I found a NEW idea ore just an interesting on ?!... I need help here..
thanks