@Aceno0b 1. Your opponent is not banned. It seems this only happened to him once. Its definitely possible that he had a tab open on accident. And no, this is not very rare. Also, the position on the analysis board must not be the same to trigger the automatic cheat detection. You said he saw the moves on the analysis, but you cant prove it. He is not banned, so lichess is confident enough he is not a cheater,right? And why would he play such a bad opening, if he was cheating? If he was, he would have seen that its a bad idea.
2. You can say you are the only one who played it. But saying that she played it also and was banned is totally unnecessary. Its public shaming.
Haha, I feel no need to respond to your suppositions (which are just that, when no one knows the cheat detection rules). I also note I beat you at 3 check, and you blocked me :) I can't see the chat, follow or challenge icons on your profile, but I can see them on my alt account. Axe to grind, by any chance? :D Hahaha
You comment: "You can say you are the only one who played it. But saying that she played it also and was banned is totally unnecessary. Its [sic] public shaming." It's NOT unnecessary, because anyone who checked would see she played it too, and she's not marked in the database entry, only on her profile page.
Can you stop hijacking my three check thread with...rather uninteresting...opinions. Euphemism city :p
@Aceno0b wow you beat my at 3-check, a variant to which you dedicated your whole life, as i can assume from your comments. And i dont know any theory about 3-check. Also i blocked you, because you are public shaming people, not because i lost..
I will stop to discuss now. But you should just explain the opening next time, without the unnecessary information about the other person who played this opening and was banned. Also no need to mention, the game was stopped and it says cheat detected. We can all see it, no need to be so penetrant and mentioning it. And my argumentation, that you cant prove it, and he is not banned yet is still valid.
You blocked me for public shaming, when blocking means you can still read my comments? Come now, is that really likely? Why would you block me in a way that achieves nothing? I think you blocked me for other reasons :)
You say: "Also no need to mention, the game was stopped and it says cheat detected. We can all see it, no need to be so penetrant and mentioning it." EXACTLY!!! EXACTLY! You complain because I stated what lichess stated clearly in the move list of the game!!!! WHAT?!?!?!?! I can't state in a Lichess forum what Lichess has already stated?!?!? Are you really serious? Are you listening to yourself? Lichess encourages us to post these games in the forum!!!!!
Penetrant is not a word. It's not even a foreign derivative of an applicable word in that sentence :D
Uhh, I'm on the hunt :D I scent blood. Much better to scent it on the chess board. So! The opening! Cool, huh? :)
@Aceno0b Unfortunately i see them. I thought blocking will prevent me from seeing anything from you. But i was wrong. I will stop discussing now. I will just report you. Have a nice day
What should we call this 3 check opening? Any suggestions? It has no name. It derives from the Bishops opening in standard chess, but is a completely different opening after a few moves. That's the excitement of 3 check, we are exploring the wild west where all mayhem breaks loose! We are creating opening novelties with the help of Stockfish and our own instincts. In Stockfish we have a 2600-rated GM friend available 24/7 to check out our ideas! And we get to decide the names of our new openings, as a Lichess 3 check community! Awesome!
Lol I dare you to name it after yourself
This is crazy!!! I got to play the opening again today, after waiting so long to play it once!!! This time I got to finish the game. I had to partially improvise it from move eight, but it was still zero inaccuracies, zero mistakes, zero blunders, 11 centipawn loss. I do admit that if this thread had been written by someone else, I would wonder if he was cheating and arranging opponents :p But life is just very strange sometimes.
I've already called a new gambit I invented after myself :p I'm in love with it, but I need to memorize the four gambit declined variations before I unleash it on the world :p
I think this apparently freak occurrence needs some further explanation, lest I am accused of cheating. I think I must have had many chances to play this opening, but was reluctant to play d4 because it seems to just blunder a pawn, and there are times when you misremember theory horribly. I didn't realize when I played d4 in the first game that this was the bishop sac on e7 line, but I just felt so sure that d4 was theory I decided to play it speculatively. Then BOOM! I remembered it was the e7 sac line. And the door was suddenly open to play d4 again in the second game, once I remembered the power of unleashing the bishop. So it's probably not a freak occurrence after all.
