I'm keeping the discussion more broad-based. It goes along the lines of chess being a solved game. Games in general?
Since chess is proven to be invented by a human, did something else influence that person or people to make it? Why not create something more complex that chess? Why provide a solution at all if you want to maintain curiosity?
If you think no one created this believing some other means, then site the source. If you do not know then welcome to the world of guess work until proven.
Did you win a game you should have lost? How about vice versa? The solution does not always come from a perfect game-yet the experience from the possibility of multiple outcomes.
Since chess is proven to be invented by a human, did something else influence that person or people to make it? Why not create something more complex that chess? Why provide a solution at all if you want to maintain curiosity?
If you think no one created this believing some other means, then site the source. If you do not know then welcome to the world of guess work until proven.
Did you win a game you should have lost? How about vice versa? The solution does not always come from a perfect game-yet the experience from the possibility of multiple outcomes.