lichess.org
Donate

One of the best games I've played!



Check out my analysis as to why this is such a complex game that even Stockfish 10+ can't understand :D I wish i can play like this more often though...
@Nikkoi Wow! While I did notice that stockfish was able to see many of the correct moves above depth 20, these tactics are really good! This game is GM-worthy.
A nice Budapest attack.
12 Nd5 13 Nc7 17 Nxa8 is greed, which you punished well.
7 Bd3 is not smart: 7 Be2 is more solid.
Usually black plays ...a5, ...Ra6 and ...Rh6 in these lines.
Kramnik played like that when he was young.
Yea, the attack would have been not so easy, or maybe impossible, if the d1-h5 diagonal was protected. Instead of standard a5-Ra6 plan, i usually like lifting my e-rook instead. d6 complements it perfectly as the light squared bishop gets opened, but some other opportunity arose and i took advantage!
7. Bd3? it's not book move also engines not see tactics at low depth
nice game
@tpr The engine says 7. Bd3 is best at depth = 37 according to the analysis stored in the cloud...
@SavageAntarctican considering the outcome of the game, Be2 really does seem more solid. I guess d3 is a more aggressive square for the bishop, but I pretty much am always able to take the bishop pair for my knight

@paranoyaksabunu yeah, Be2 is what is usually played in the database too. Stockfish isn't that good in those kinds of tactics, especially lower than 21 depth. Leela would be better in these, but is i believe weaker in endgame accuracy

@JaiminChudasama_23 huh?...

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.