2200 at 11 means 4400 at 22( mathematically, not practically)
What do you mean @MrPushwood ?
2200 at 11 is good, but all your blitz and bullet will not make you better.
Look at the following 10+0 game: you play way too fast, a bad habit from blitz and bullet.
You play a sharp gambit with ...c6, but then you play ...Bf5 instead of the logical ...e5. It is not clear if the bishop belongs at f5, but it is clear that the pawn belongs on e5. So do not commit the bishop that early.
Your ...e6 is timid. Again ...e5. Generally ...e6 is a solid move, but not if you play a gambit.
You play a lot of shallow, bullet like moves with your knight and your bishop.
Look at the following 10+0 game: you play way too fast, a bad habit from blitz and bullet.
You play a sharp gambit with ...c6, but then you play ...Bf5 instead of the logical ...e5. It is not clear if the bishop belongs at f5, but it is clear that the pawn belongs on e5. So do not commit the bishop that early.
Your ...e6 is timid. Again ...e5. Generally ...e6 is a solid move, but not if you play a gambit.
You play a lot of shallow, bullet like moves with your knight and your bishop.
Why do you ask it? If you play chess, i think you can answer the question yourself.
So what do think: Is it good or not?
So what do think: Is it good or not?
At 11, everything seems possible, at 20 maybe ten, at 30, five, at 40, three and so on until you reach 80 (or 90), when only one thing is possible.
@chesseater78 I know
Good boy, quite intelligent too ; ). You will hopefully have a bright future. Good luck on your path, my friend!
@chesseater78 thanks!
<Comment deleted by user>
@FynnActon 1.5 years ago I started playing chess
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.