Always afraid of other people's queens. It's just a villainous piece. My queen was no less a villain.
40 Kf4 was cooperative. A king should become active in the endgame, but not as long as the opposing queen is on the board. Also a queen + a passed pawn is a strong combination. The queen can help the pawn promote on her own, without help from her king.
#2 @tpr
I played for the victory, because my opponent had a relatively low rating. He, in turn, was also determined to win. My rival wanted to bring his king into the square g6, to put a check to my king. I realized this when he introduced his king to an active game. The role of my passing pawn was reduced to the role of a saboteur in a foreign camp, although he reached the third rank and he himself became a force sufficient to win.
In chess endgames with a heterogeneous material, the advantage of the player's experience and class is brighter.
I played for the victory, because my opponent had a relatively low rating. He, in turn, was also determined to win. My rival wanted to bring his king into the square g6, to put a check to my king. I realized this when he introduced his king to an active game. The role of my passing pawn was reduced to the role of a saboteur in a foreign camp, although he reached the third rank and he himself became a force sufficient to win.
In chess endgames with a heterogeneous material, the advantage of the player's experience and class is brighter.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.