And why is no one talking about how silly I was to post this in the wrong forum :)
I can't look at this game without eye bleeding o0 so many blunders on both sides o_∆
@PranavRamesh8 , King safety is paramount in chess unless you have an unstoppable initiative. Ideally, we should try not to give any counter play to the opponent and they are helpless. Now, that is called destroying them. Also, in that case h3 was a waste of a tempo as well and doesn't really contribute to the attack.
@PranavRamesh8 i play kings gambit too . 5 bc4 is too dubious and risky for a classical game try 5 g3 you will get an interesting game .
thanks for the tip @SrikaraSoulOfTal
I tried to make some sort of Muzio gambit just in case they played g4. That was the reason behind bc4.
Nice game!
thanks :)
1) I repeat for the third time, sorry for posting this in the wrong forum, I never did this before.
2) I am looking for some critisizm...
2) I am looking for some critisizm...
"You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"- Magician from riga . i guess that's what u did
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.