Blacklist of Lichess

But then there is no need to declare freedom, equal rights for all users of the site. Or am I wrong?

@Tenakel said in #8:
> @Kalibron
>
> You must have experienced absolutely horrible things here!
>
> I don't think it's good to throw any claims into the discussion. Of course you can say whatever you want in the forum, but your accusation is very harsh. If you're accusing lichess of maintaining a blacklist here, you should provide an example in this thread that leads you to that assumption.

I don't understand you and your mentality!!! I'm not worried about myself or my account. I'm worried about everyone!!! And I don't understand how a lichess.org can be an international organization if all his work is based on individual preferences, and not on religion, principles, rules, etc.

@Kalibron

I want to relieve you of a burden: you don't have to worry about me.

While I'm trying really hard, I really don't know what your problem is. Your statements are too nebulous and cryptic for me.

By the way:
The lichess platform was not created by robots, but by human beings.

@Kalibron said in #11:
> But then there is no need to declare freedom, equal rights for all users of the site. Or am I wrong?
Where does lichess declare this?

and better question how does lichess give people these rights when they dont stay in lichess?

li chess

@Kalibron what exactly do you mean by a "blacklist of lichess"?

@Kalibron said in #12:

Just play chess, it's better for your health

Someone's confused here, and it's not me.

Actually no, I'm pretty confused too.

Can't find any.

@Kalibron said in #6:
> No, I don't agree! You can't deny a person the right to express his own opinion. Or don't you agree?

Don't agree. There are rules we all have to follow, some are from laws, some are to do with making a productive and enjoyable site. Just one example, you shouldn't have the right to express bigotry.

@Kalibron said in #11:
> But then there is no need to declare freedom, equal rights for all users of the site. Or am I wrong?

You're wrong in a few ways. The freedom is related to source code, privacy/tracking and freedom to play chess. Not freedom to say whatever you want in a forum.

If the aim is to be inclusive and tolerant, intolerance can't be tolerated or the aim is broken. Tolerate all but the intolerant. That's the only way.

You can appeal decisions. People make mistakes.