lichess.org
Donate

me winning vs a 2200

de.lichess.org/@/UN/perf/blitz

So that is what your argument was? U tried to base your argument on my old rating points?
You should had looked the issue rather then focusing on other things to deflect from the fact that you only play vs UNRATED and LOWER RATED PLAYERS. YOU ARE NOT MAGNUS CARLSEN and never will be.
I never said I was Magnus Carlsen, only that the rating gap between myself and Carlsen is similar to the troll, and myself which is true. In chess skill I am give or take as far beyond Xo as Carlsen is beyond me. Which is a big gap.
I am XO, this is just my second account. I have 1750 Blitz and 1750 Bullet..How is that a big gap from your ratings?

Why do you play only UNRATED and LOWER RATED PLAYERS btw?

And You only played 150 RATED games(do you fear you would mess up your rating points?). And Where i played 4k rated games. Yeh sure, u are like Magnus Carlsen to me. I ve never heard something that stupid.
You and your negativity don't belong here, @Xo, who is also @UN. If you don't know how to be positive, you might as well go live under a rock. Also, I don't think you are allowed to have two accounts. Not sure.

@lurarose, Xo is kinda right, though. You should play more rated games. That is how you find out how good you are. Eve though 2200 is a high rating, 2000 is pretty high, too. It's like getting overly excited with this game played by @ganeshtsk and @Tigor. Thank you, Lichess users, for this game:

en.lichess.org/7fLwnzUD

The rating gap is only 200 points. Why get so excited about that? This is from someone who is much worse at chess than you, so you better listen. Still, good game. Thanks for showing it to us!
@UN

I mostly play unrated games because I don't really care about rating. I assure you It would be a bit higher if I only played rated games, and never played low rated players.

As for playing lower rated players, so what if I do? For one it's not every game. I pretty much just look at the time controls, and not the rating before I play a game with anyone. Also why do you concern yourself with who other players play against?

Not even going to brag about a list of titled players I may or may not have beaten on other accounts. Because I don't care to do so.

I don't fear messing up rating points, I wouldn't care if I sandbagged my rating down to 800 it would be funny to murder people's rating points on my way back up. So many people would be griping if I did that though...

The difference between you, and I is I play chess for fun. You play chess for rating points. I play casually for my own amusement. You play all seriously. The difference between you, and I is that I am like a person reading a book for leisure, where as you are like the student who is reading to do a book report on a subject they hate hoping to get that A or B so they can take home that grade and hang it on the fridge.

The main point I'm trying to make here is when I half ass it, and play just for shits and giggles my amusement... I still am significantly stronger than you when you are giving it your all, and getting oh so butt hurt in every single forum thread you post in... That doesn't matter though, I just play for fun.

@TheKillerSacrifice

Agreed, it could be a lot better than it is, but like I said above... Don't care about rating. Rating means nothing, only good moves matter.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.