The Rebirth of Why politics on Lichess?

@tabarjack said in #4:
> Let me know when science agrees with you, until then, shhh
Hmm... I guess science has decided to abandon your side now and turn to mine.
Oh wait... science was never on your side.

Quite horrible that the climate change denialist from 3 years ago is still active, and still possesses posting rights

@Cedur216 said in #12:
> Quite horrible that the climate change denialist from 3 years ago is still active, and still possesses posting rights
I've already dealt with at least 8 this past week, if not more.

Also in #6, those writings below the links I wrote by myself. And that's from a 14000 word long ILA "essay" that I wrote.

And now if I write anything over one page for another ILA assignment my teacher will grade only that first page...

That just proves humans collected data that can answer the question "has the Earth been warming up in the past 70 years?" positively. Please provide proof that it's man-made. Keep in mind the Earth has been much warmer than now in the past (and life prevailed) so simply answering the question for past century even is as unreliable as it is unscientific.

If science to you is collecting data and asking questions after (that really pleases the investors/customers and I'm totally guilty of doing that too since it means more money in the end), without even reproducing said data, then you missed the point of science as a whole and are likely a sophist, not a scientist.

Also, if science means that to you, you shouldn't be using a computer nor a cellphone. Data says it could cause long term health issues, but I don't see you caring about that, with good reason too. It's probably just lies created by Sears before they went bankrupt.

@tabarjack said in #15:
> That just proves humans collected data that can answer the question "has the Earth been warming up in the past 70 years?" positively. Please provide proof that it's man-made. Keep in mind the Earth has been much warmer than now in the past (and life prevailed) so simply answering the question for past century even is as unreliable as it is unscientific.
Are you like blind or something?? Or a robot maybe?? Because I DID JUST PROVIDE YOU EVIDENCE MY GOD.
> If science to you is collecting data and asking questions after (that really pleases the investors/customers and I'm totally guilty of doing that too since it means more money in the end), without even reproducing said data, then you missed the point of science as a whole and are likely a sophist, not a scientist.
That part makes like -90% sense. That's how bad it is.
> Also, if science means that to you, you shouldn't be using a computer nor a cellphone. Data says it could cause long term health issues, but I don't see you caring about that, with good reason too. It's probably just lies created by Sears before they went bankrupt.
Don't accuse me of anything if you're doing the exact same thing that I am.

I forgot to mention, we would be extinct if it were man-made. Not only did man not change habits since the 1970s, but we created new ways to pollute and generate greenhouse gasses as well as expanding that very evil technology to China and India, who happen to be the most populated countries on Earth. We were supposed to all die by 1980, the "scientists" said. It's 2023 and I'm still alive. It's as legit as Rael's religion.

@tabarjack said in #17:
> I forgot to mention, we would be extinct if it were man-made. Not only did man not change habits since the 1970s, but we created new ways to pollute and generate greenhouse gasses as well as expanding that very evil technology to China and India, who happen to be the most populated countries on Earth. We were supposed to all die by 1980, the "scientists" said. It's 2023 and I'm still alive. It's as legit as Rael's religion.
Links must be provided.

@LordSupremeChess said in #16:
> Are you like blind or something?? Or a robot maybe?? Because I DID JUST PROVIDE YOU EVIDENCE MY GOD.

Even the dead links are still opened. I read most of them. A few are... inane at best while most sing the same song like a broken record. Keep in mind that record isn't recent, it's older than you, it's older than me. We always die in 5-10 years since the 1970s. It's kind of like Hollywood rehashing Batman movies, find something new.

One of them was a fun read, not gonna lie: The one that speaks of Congo. I would love to see their bogus catastrophe scenario come to fruition.

@tabarjack said in #19:
> Even the dead links are still opened. I read most of them. A few are... inane at best while most sing the same song like a broken record. Keep in mind that record isn't recent, it's older than you, it's older than me. We always die in 5-10 years since the 1970s. It's kind of like Hollywood rehashing Batman movies, find something new.
>
> One of them was a fun read, not gonna lie: The one that speaks of Congo. I would love to see their bogus catastrophe scenario come to fruition.
I'd love to see your bogus claim that you STILL HAVEN'T PROVIDED EVEN ONE LINK FOR WHEN I SAID TO IN #7 come true as well, but science says it will be the other way around. Mine will happen, and yours won't.