lichess.org
Donate

I have a problem with MrPushwood

#31
@JohnLuke090904

From yesterday (and his next post suggests a more accurate analysis by another poster):
lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/rook-and-king-checkmate#3

From the day before:
lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/game-analysis-34#2

From a few days ago:
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/one-mate-you-dont-get-to-see-every-day#3

And:
lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/a-game-6#5
lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/analyze-games-3#2
lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/good-middlegame-lesson-for-me#3https://lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/e5-blunder-on-sicilian-confused-by-engines-move#4

This was a pretty basic search, and doesn't include things like him recounting a tournament he won, or talking about general chess endgames and what to study. But sure, tell yourself it's the five year olds who are downvoting your post and it's not that you're wrong.
#32
@chummer I couldn’t care less about downvotes. I still think I’m right and no negative IQ loser with no life is going to convince me otherwise.
#35
@JohnLuke090904

You're hysterical! You toss around the adjective 'thin-skinned' and say you don't care about downthumbs, but you're the same guy who took so much offense to a comment I made that was critical of South Park that you combed through my history and downthumbed a dozen of my posts.

And it takes a special person to claim that evidence presented that contrary to their pre-formed opinions won't change their mind one bit!
#36
@JohnLuke090904 Look dude, we each have our own opinions. Everyone has a right to their own opinions - so why are you insulting us about it? We have different opinions, no need for insulting.
#38
I sort of agree with John, but push wood guy does help sometimes!
#39
This was a dumb idea trying to convince people. I should’ve known people would get angry over nothing. Mods close this forum and end the misery of these people who can’t take criticism.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.