Feedback on the study I created

I created this study on scheveningen varitaion of sicilian defense after studying the book: "Easy Guide to the Sicilian Scheveningen" by Steffen Pedersen. I would be happy if anyone can look over this study and give me some feedback about it.

The link to the study: lichess.org/study/qj9cQeKO

It is okay, but there is so much sicilian theory you can never learn all of it... what you show still is a small part of what is possible from either side. Especially white can change a lot in move order.

nice study for beginners

Nice thanks for sharing. It would be great if you can add some deeper lines. I have also sent you a PM.

The Keres attack almost refutes the Scheveningen. You treat this one too succinctly and you devote way too much chapters on several 6 Bc4 lines which are almost refuted since Spassky-Fischer 4th match game 1972.

The Keres attack is to OP. There was a game with two players- white player which had 1400 ELO and black player with 1900 ELO. Black was lost 20.00+ and with luck drew the game.

@chessypiano I agree. I just wanted to show basic idea of each lines.
@Mainspringer Thank you.
@Mehzinho Yes, I agree. Maybe a separate study on each variation would be better.
@tpr I usually face Bc4 lines while playing as black so I decided to spend more time on it. I agree keres attack is very strong. Compared to white, black has to find really strong defensive moves to survive. I am thinking of making a study on keres attack.
@faketpr Can you link that game? I would like to see that game.

I won't tell share real names ok? I will send it.

...