Bishops are racist not gay
Pawns must be gay, if they want a promotion to Queen... They must be a transvestite or a transsexual. :]
What the hell is this! We are debating and assuming genders and if the pieces are straight or not.
What has this forum become...
What has this forum become...
@Sertai
"become"? This isn't new. From 4 months ago:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is calling one player first and the other second politically correct? No, as it implies that one player has the "right" to go first, whereas the other player does not have that right. We should call them "player who has the opportunity to move his pieces prior to his opponent, which in no way should be an indictment of any qualities of the opponent, but rather obtained the opportunity in the form of an arbitrary result," and "player, who through no fault of their own, was not provided the opportunity with which to move prior to the other player." For the remainder of this post, they will be referred to as A and 1, respectively
Regarding piece designations, each piece should have their own name. Just because a piece moves like another piece does not mean it is any less unique than its counterparts. Personally, I refer to my b-Knight as Dwayne, for example, while my f-pawn (when playing as player A, of course, to avoid any potential for being misunderstood) is named Steeve Ho You Fat, in honor of the French basketball player's ability to overcome the adversity that his name brings (note: I am not actually sure if Steeve Ho You Fat has encountered all that much name-bullying, as a result of the fact that he is 6-8 and always looks happy. Also, congratulations on getting back into the LNB Pro A, Steeve)
In order to overcome the idea that chess is sexist with regards to the whole king/queen thing, I have developed a solution: player 1's king and queen will be named Lana Wachowski and Larry Wachowski, respectively, while player A's queen and king will be named Andrew Wachowski and Lilly Wachowski, respectively.
I think we can all agree that I am, like, the most politically correct individual since the ironically-now-considered-politically-correct Bill Clinton
"become"? This isn't new. From 4 months ago:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is calling one player first and the other second politically correct? No, as it implies that one player has the "right" to go first, whereas the other player does not have that right. We should call them "player who has the opportunity to move his pieces prior to his opponent, which in no way should be an indictment of any qualities of the opponent, but rather obtained the opportunity in the form of an arbitrary result," and "player, who through no fault of their own, was not provided the opportunity with which to move prior to the other player." For the remainder of this post, they will be referred to as A and 1, respectively
Regarding piece designations, each piece should have their own name. Just because a piece moves like another piece does not mean it is any less unique than its counterparts. Personally, I refer to my b-Knight as Dwayne, for example, while my f-pawn (when playing as player A, of course, to avoid any potential for being misunderstood) is named Steeve Ho You Fat, in honor of the French basketball player's ability to overcome the adversity that his name brings (note: I am not actually sure if Steeve Ho You Fat has encountered all that much name-bullying, as a result of the fact that he is 6-8 and always looks happy. Also, congratulations on getting back into the LNB Pro A, Steeve)
In order to overcome the idea that chess is sexist with regards to the whole king/queen thing, I have developed a solution: player 1's king and queen will be named Lana Wachowski and Larry Wachowski, respectively, while player A's queen and king will be named Andrew Wachowski and Lilly Wachowski, respectively.
I think we can all agree that I am, like, the most politically correct individual since the ironically-now-considered-politically-correct Bill Clinton
Ok, I agree, but the fact remains, you are considering Larry as gay as he is not. Clearly having married Lana and had kids Andrew and Lilly (This is how I see it I don't know why). You are the most politically correct, you are running aren't you ;-)
Umm...Lana and Lilly Wachowski are brothers/sisters (IDK which one to go with: they produced the Matrix trilogy as "the Wachowski brothers", but that was before their operations).
Yes, Knights are the gayest chess piece. Knights are also the only non-human chess pieces.
@CC_39 Rooks are non-human as well.
i swear everyone's gay , trans, bi now... so what if a pawn wants to one day grow up and dress in drag.. so what the king longs for an affair with a rook... the knight just does everything maybe thats why he/she hops all over the board...
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.