show non titled players simuls pls

@shamalamadingdong said in #10:
> Think Buffer made a good argument why the current format for simuls stays, in the forum linked in #2

"Nothing prevents you from creating a simul, absolutely nothing. You just don't get the same level of promotion, but that is not a feature."

Yes, this is the exact definition of unequal (buffer was responding to #28 in that forum: "It most certainly means that Lichess does not now offer equal access for all members, to all features !").

I would argue that the accessibility of a feature itself is part of a feature. The existence of a simul itself isn't the feature itself: The feature also encompasses who gets to use it and to what extent do they get to use it. It is most certainly unequal. Lichess has no problem with this (they've done it before on other things too), but it appears the people do.

If some group of people have access to features and another group doesn't, that makes it unequal.

Frankly, #1 has a good idea. If you aren't willing to promote nontitled players next to titled players, at least give them a separate room. Sure, it's segregation, but it's better than nothing at all.

@TCF_Namelecc said in #11:
> "Nothing prevents you from creating a simul, absolutely nothing. You just don't get the same level of promotion, but that is not a feature."
>
> Yes, this is the exact definition of unequal (buffer was responding to #28 in that forum: "It most certainly means that Lichess does not now offer equal access for all members, to all features !").
>
> I would argue that the accessibility of a feature itself is part of a feature. The existence of a simul itself isn't the feature itself: The feature also encompasses who gets to use it and to what extent do they get to use it. It is most certainly unequal. Lichess has no problem with this (they've done it before on other things too), but it appears the people do.
>
> If some group of people have access to features and another group doesn't, that makes it unequal.
>
> Frankly, #1 has a good idea. If you aren't willing to promote nontitled players next to titled players, at least give them a separate room. Sure, it's segregation, but it's better than nothing at all.
@TCF_Namelecc said in #11:
> "Nothing prevents you from creating a simul, absolutely nothing. You just don't get the same level of promotion, but that is not a feature."
>
> Yes, this is the exact definition of unequal (buffer was responding to #28 in that forum: "It most certainly means that Lichess does not now offer equal access for all members, to all features !").
>
> I would argue that the accessibility of a feature itself is part of a feature. The existence of a simul itself isn't the feature itself: The feature also encompasses who gets to use it and to what extent do they get to use it. It is most certainly unequal. Lichess has no problem with this (they've done it before on other things too), but it appears the people do.
>
> If some group of people have access to features and another group doesn't, that makes it unequal.
>
> Frankly, #1 has a good idea. If you aren't willing to promote nontitled players next to titled players, at least give them a separate room. Sure, it's segregation, but it's better than nothing at all.

I was looking though my freinds posts when i found they responded in a post joust like this
it was archived so i decided to make a duplicate

people who are under 2300 or 2400 may not be so good that you can play with them and learn something new.
but still some people will be playing with lower rated players just for the sake of the improvement of the creator.
there can be a setting which shows you the simuls of people who are lower rated. i feel its to extra to add it.

the thing i would like is show 5 ( or any numbers mods choose ) non titled players simul who r hosting 5 who have highest rating and same for titled if lichess wish or thinks better they can do something else but i think this will be good.

@plsdontclosemyacc said in #14:
> the thing i would like is show 5 ( or any numbers mods choose ) non titled players simul who r hosting 5 who have highest rating and same for titled if lichess wish or thinks better they can do something else but i think this will be good.
you do make a very good point but what about the really low rated players (like me)
maybe just random 5 simuls would be good
i hope they dont close your account @plsdontclosemyacc

@Rahsulaimon said in #15:
> you do make a very good point but what about the really low rated players (like me)
> maybe just random 5 simuls would be good
> i hope they dont close your account @plsdontclosemyacc
it really can't be possible for all to get chance u can make a team for simuls .

ehm i already did
(not saying what team tho)