Hi all
First of all, I would like to say I appreciate the minimum rated games on key tournaments a great deal and feel this has gone a long way to increase the pleasantness of the site. A big thanks on that first.
But maybe there is still some room for improvement in this area. As an example, let us suppose that certain people play the minimum number of games prior to winning or doing well in tournaments. That is fine in itself, but what if in fact it seems they had a different account the day or some days before. Is this entirely fair to the established players on the site, that do not do any "account-switching" ?!
For me personally, I am not entirely sure it is entirely fair to established players on the site that someone could potentially come in with a new account every other day, playing the minimum number of games prior to playing a tournament that day.
Is it not possible to consider adding some extra restriction on key tournaments as well as minimum number of games, to say "And not allowed to create a new account just for this tournament". Or increase the minimum days playing time for some of the more important tournaments - not just min rated games played.
The way I see it they might gain in the following ways:
1) They might feel they can be abrasive on tournament chat with their throwaway temporary account
2) They might ensure potentially a less strong opponent average rating
3) They might remain unknown compared to established players on the site - in terms of openings etc
Now it might not be done intentionally - maybe they are not remembering their original username and password. Perhaps there might be some little innovation there which can also help alleviate the underlying symptoms, to help prompt or remember login username and passwords - maybe for example a mobile phone reminder facility. Perhaps if some innovation is possible in this area, it might also reduce the potential need for "multi-account" switching or creation as well.
Cheers, K
First of all, I would like to say I appreciate the minimum rated games on key tournaments a great deal and feel this has gone a long way to increase the pleasantness of the site. A big thanks on that first.
But maybe there is still some room for improvement in this area. As an example, let us suppose that certain people play the minimum number of games prior to winning or doing well in tournaments. That is fine in itself, but what if in fact it seems they had a different account the day or some days before. Is this entirely fair to the established players on the site, that do not do any "account-switching" ?!
For me personally, I am not entirely sure it is entirely fair to established players on the site that someone could potentially come in with a new account every other day, playing the minimum number of games prior to playing a tournament that day.
Is it not possible to consider adding some extra restriction on key tournaments as well as minimum number of games, to say "And not allowed to create a new account just for this tournament". Or increase the minimum days playing time for some of the more important tournaments - not just min rated games played.
The way I see it they might gain in the following ways:
1) They might feel they can be abrasive on tournament chat with their throwaway temporary account
2) They might ensure potentially a less strong opponent average rating
3) They might remain unknown compared to established players on the site - in terms of openings etc
Now it might not be done intentionally - maybe they are not remembering their original username and password. Perhaps there might be some little innovation there which can also help alleviate the underlying symptoms, to help prompt or remember login username and passwords - maybe for example a mobile phone reminder facility. Perhaps if some innovation is possible in this area, it might also reduce the potential need for "multi-account" switching or creation as well.
Cheers, K