It only shows the puzzles of 5 days ago in the historic.
The last time you solved a rated puzzle was June 7th.
It shows up like this on your account: Solved 17 tactical puzzles 1694 [up arrow] 31
It shows up like this on your account: Solved 17 tactical puzzles 1694 [up arrow] 31
@StingerPuzzles I think you should realize that @mattheusporque used the word "only" implying that he has solved puzzled more recently than 5 days ago.
Anyway, the new version won't show puzzles that didn't count towards your score. The problem has been discussed here several times, such as here: lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/unfairness-of-new-lichess-puzzle-ratings-due-to-ease-of-skipping-puzzles So, you can solve some puzzles and it can note that you solved them, and you shouldn't ever get them again, but they won't count towards your score or show up in your list of puzzled solved. I think they programmed this in to prevent anyone from spending too much time on a puzzle. I explained in more detail here: lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/i-miss-the-puzzle-graph#5 but it is just a theory of mine to explain this new version of the puzzles where sometimes they are recorded and sometimes they are not.
Anyway, the new version won't show puzzles that didn't count towards your score. The problem has been discussed here several times, such as here: lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/unfairness-of-new-lichess-puzzle-ratings-due-to-ease-of-skipping-puzzles So, you can solve some puzzles and it can note that you solved them, and you shouldn't ever get them again, but they won't count towards your score or show up in your list of puzzled solved. I think they programmed this in to prevent anyone from spending too much time on a puzzle. I explained in more detail here: lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/i-miss-the-puzzle-graph#5 but it is just a theory of mine to explain this new version of the puzzles where sometimes they are recorded and sometimes they are not.
@jasontaylor7 Puzzle history doesn't show puzzles from Puzzle Streak, Puzzle Storm , or Puzzle Racer.
As I said, it only includes rated puzzles.
It seems like a reasonable choice. Any other design choice would include puzzles that you didn't have time to look at, that showed up for one second?
I have no idea why you think it has anything to do with time spent looking at a puzzle or the length of body parts. That's very odd.
As I said, it only includes rated puzzles.
It seems like a reasonable choice. Any other design choice would include puzzles that you didn't have time to look at, that showed up for one second?
I have no idea why you think it has anything to do with time spent looking at a puzzle or the length of body parts. That's very odd.
@StingerPuzzles "Puzzle history doesn't show puzzles from Puzzle Streak, Puzzle Storm , or Puzzle Racer." I don't think you read what I wrote ("So, you can solve some puzzles and it can note that you solved them, and you shouldn't ever get them again, but they won't count towards your score or show up in your list of puzzled solved."), since this sentence omits that there are puzzles that lichess perhaps flagged as user potentially cheated with, usually incorrectly. The link discusses a solution to the puzzle switch issue for people who want to break up a multi-move puzzle (and all the puzzles at higher levels are indeed multi-move ones) into different problems to solve during their different breaks. If you do that the puzzles change and you never finish a puzzle unless you make a wrong move, so your score usually can only go down not up. The now-deleted solution given (clicking on the puzzle url) solves the puzzle switch problem but causes the puzzle to not count. Perhaps if you read the links in more detail you will understand a little about why @mattheusporque might have been talking about something besides puzzle streak, storm, or racer. If you have a better theory for why lichess developers feel a need to have this bogus anti-cheat stuff, which is still trivial to defeat using "open link in an incognito window," feel free to reveal your superior theory.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.