I did have a chuckle at this one, @Kingscrusher-YouTube :D - it's a shame your wry humour didn't make it through to most of the above!
I'm guessing you got this idea from Chess.com and there new chess treasurers. Either way, it seems like a terrible idea, who would buy a chess game.
this website is non-profit bruh
I studied the Rust source code of openethereum for 2 months now in order to educate myself. I installed "Opera Crypto Browser" to keep me updated of related literatures. I've analyzed transactions hashes in etherscan, test deploy ERC-20 smart contracts. I deployed local nodes, connect to Metamask, etc. After all of these, I still don't get why a tweet or a jpeg could cost that much. In fact, in the NFT EIP-721 specification, the original owner can still resell the digital artifact to other buyers even if it is already bought by someone.
The only explanation that ring a bell is that, a Picasso is just a piece of paper, yet it cost millions. The Shroud of Turin was just a piece of cloth, yet it is priceless. From here, I can see where its value came from. But an NFT is none of these bcoz the original owner can still resell it, such that there will be two owners of the item at the same time.
The only explanation that ring a bell is that, a Picasso is just a piece of paper, yet it cost millions. The Shroud of Turin was just a piece of cloth, yet it is priceless. From here, I can see where its value came from. But an NFT is none of these bcoz the original owner can still resell it, such that there will be two owners of the item at the same time.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.