What are few ways to win a chess game most of the time?
Making no mistakes.
@PratyushDey2910 "What are few ways to win a chess game most of the time?" the best way is to win most of the time :D
Setting traps.
Getting your pieces and your opponent's pieces into a position such that it is their move, their king is under threat and they have no legal moves which would remove that threat.
Better than your opponent.
At low level there is alway at least one move to gain a material advantage ;)
At low level there is alway at least one move to gain a material advantage ;)
Checkmate
Thanks for your tips!!! Now it will a little easier for me to win games :)
@PratyushDey2910
Chess is a game of errors, first and foremost.
The frequency of errors diminishes as skill and ability increase.
So, weaker play is typically strewn with avoidable mistakes and blunders that are almost non-existent at Master-level, though they still do occur even in very high-stakes games.
So, the weaker player who understands simple opening principles as well as the purpose of the opening phase of the game which can be summed up as "quick and harmonious development of the pieces and king safety" already has a significant advantage over the weaker player who doesn't and whose moves are completely unrelated to this goal or to each other.
Once that stage is passed, a simple and useful strategy is to seek to create organic weaknesses in the opponent's pawn structure which can be exploited later, in the endgame: multiple pawn islands, doubled-pawns, isolated pawns, etc.
Of course, if your opponent blunders and you have a resulting material advantage, the simplest strategy is to force exchanges or induce your opponent into them until you have one piece left (aside from your king) and your opponent has none. The win is generally easy in this type of circumstance.
If you do reach the endgame with equal material, you generally want to centralize your King as it will become an active and attacking piece and failure to do so will put you at a serious disadvantage if your opponent does.
More generally, though, it is all a question of piece "activity" and tactical opportunity.
So, you want each of your pieces to be "active", for example: a rook on an open or half-open file, doubled and communicating rooks on a file or a rank, bishops that are not restricted by their own pawns, knights nearer the center than to the edges, etc.
You also want to drill very basic, low-level tactics every day so you will recognize the tactical situations when they arise on the board.
With all of this, if you can systematically "blunder-check" before moving you should win more games than those of your opponents who do not know this or do this.
Chess is a game of errors, first and foremost.
The frequency of errors diminishes as skill and ability increase.
So, weaker play is typically strewn with avoidable mistakes and blunders that are almost non-existent at Master-level, though they still do occur even in very high-stakes games.
So, the weaker player who understands simple opening principles as well as the purpose of the opening phase of the game which can be summed up as "quick and harmonious development of the pieces and king safety" already has a significant advantage over the weaker player who doesn't and whose moves are completely unrelated to this goal or to each other.
Once that stage is passed, a simple and useful strategy is to seek to create organic weaknesses in the opponent's pawn structure which can be exploited later, in the endgame: multiple pawn islands, doubled-pawns, isolated pawns, etc.
Of course, if your opponent blunders and you have a resulting material advantage, the simplest strategy is to force exchanges or induce your opponent into them until you have one piece left (aside from your king) and your opponent has none. The win is generally easy in this type of circumstance.
If you do reach the endgame with equal material, you generally want to centralize your King as it will become an active and attacking piece and failure to do so will put you at a serious disadvantage if your opponent does.
More generally, though, it is all a question of piece "activity" and tactical opportunity.
So, you want each of your pieces to be "active", for example: a rook on an open or half-open file, doubled and communicating rooks on a file or a rank, bishops that are not restricted by their own pawns, knights nearer the center than to the edges, etc.
You also want to drill very basic, low-level tactics every day so you will recognize the tactical situations when they arise on the board.
With all of this, if you can systematically "blunder-check" before moving you should win more games than those of your opponents who do not know this or do this.
Thank you sooo much!! But what if the opponent has more pawns to make a queen than how many I have? Then its sure that I am going to lose, right?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.