lichess.org
Donate
 
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Miel-Bautista Arena"] [Site "https://lichess.org/RHpfLCBv"] [Date "2020.05.12"] [White "ezechias_francisco"] [Black "Chinchanchuu24"] [Result "1-0"] [UTCDate "2020.05.12"] [UTCTime "06:45:52"] [WhiteElo "1190"] [BlackElo "1888"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+214"] [BlackRatingDiff "-226"] [Variant "Crazyhouse"] [TimeControl "180+0"] [ECO "D78"] [Opening "Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense"] [Termination "Time forfeit"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4? { (0.82 → -0.55) Mistake. Nf3 was best. } (2. Nf3 d5 3. Bg5 Nc6 4. Nbd2 h6 5. Bh4 g6 6. e3 Bg7) 2... g6?? { (-0.55 → 2.22) Blunder. d5 was best. } (2... d5 3. cxd5 e6 4. dxe6 Bxe6 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. e3 Be7 7. Nc3) 3. Nf3?! { (2.22 → 1.35) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 d6 5. e4 Bg4 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O Nbd7) 3... Bg7?! { (1.35 → 2.49) Inaccuracy. d6 was best. } (3... d6 4. Nc3) 4. g3?? { (2.49 → -1.82) Blunder. Nc3 was best. } (4. Nc3) 4... c6?? { (-1.82 → 1.37) Blunder. d5 was best. } (4... d5 5. cxd5) 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O d5?! { (0.89 → 1.64) Inaccuracy. d6 was best. } { D78 Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense } (6... d6 7. Nc3 Bf5 8. Nh4 Bg4 9. h3 Bd7 10. e4 Qc8 11. e5 Ne8 12. Nf3 Bxh3 13. Bxh3) 7. Nc3?? { (1.64 → -2.41) Blunder. cxd5 was best. } (7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Nc3 h6 9. Nxd5 cxd5 10. Ne5 Nc6 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. N@e5 Bxe5 13. dxe5 P@g7) 7... Bg4?? { (-2.41 → 5.50) Blunder. dxc4 was best. } (7... dxc4 8. Be3) 8. Qb3?? { (5.50 → 2.15) Blunder. cxd5 was best. } (8. cxd5 Nxd5) 8... Qb6?? { (2.15 → 6.28) Blunder. Bxf3 was best. } (8... Bxf3 9. Bxf3) 9. c5?? { (6.28 → 0.15) Blunder. cxd5 was best. } (9. cxd5 Qxb3) 9... Qa6?? { (0.15 → 2.12) Blunder. Qc7 was best. } (9... Qc7) 10. Ne5?! { (2.12 → 1.00) Inaccuracy. h3 was best. } (10. h3) 10... Nbd7?! { (1.00 → 1.92) Inaccuracy. Be6 was best. } (10... Be6 11. Bf4) 11. Nxg4 Nxg4 12. e3?? { (2.04 → -21.48) Blunder. B@h3 was best. } (12. B@h3) 12... e6?? { (-21.48 → 1.92) Blunder. Qxf1+ was best. } (12... Qxf1+ 13. Kxf1 Nxh2+ 14. Ke2 P@f3+ 15. Bxf3 N@g1+ 16. Kd1 R@f1+ 17. Kc2 Nhxf3 18. B@d3 Ne1+ 19. Kb1) 13. h3?? { (1.92 → -14.93) Blunder. B@e2 was best. } (13. B@e2 Nxc5 14. dxc5 P@h3 15. Bxh3 Qxe2 16. Nxe2 N@f3+ 17. Kh1 Nfxh2 18. Bxg4 Nxf1 19. Q@h4 R@h2+) 13... Ngf6?? { (-14.93 → 1.07) Blunder. Nxc5 was best. } (13... Nxc5 14. B@e2) 14. Re1?? { (1.07 → -1.43) Blunder. B@e2 was best. } (14. B@e2 Nxc5) 14... Ne8?? { (-1.43 → 3.31) Blunder. Nxc5 was best. } (14... Nxc5) 15. Bd2? { (3.31 → 1.46) Mistake. B@e2 was best. } (15. B@e2 Qxe2 16. Nxe2 B@e4 17. f3 Bxf3 18. Bxf3 P@e4 19. Bg2 b6 20. B@e7 Nef6 21. Bxf8 Rxf8) 15... Rb8? { (1.46 → 3.14) Mistake. N@c4 was best. } (15... N@c4) 16. a4?? { (3.14 → 0.31) Blunder. Qc2 was best. } (16. Qc2 N@c4 17. B@e2 Qa5 18. Nxd5 Qxd2 19. Ne7+ Kh8 20. Qxc4 Qxb2 21. Reb1 Qd2 22. N@e4 Qa5) 16... b6? { (0.31 → 1.96) Mistake. Qa5 was best. } (16... Qa5) 17. cxb6?! { (1.96 → 0.86) Inaccuracy. B@f4 was best. } (17. B@f4 Rb7) 17... Rxb6 18. Qa3?? { (1.15 → -1.72) Blunder. Qd1 was best. } (18. Qd1 f5 19. B@a3 Rf7 20. P@b5 Qb7 21. bxc6 Rxc6 22. P@b5 Rc4 23. Nxd5 P@c2 24. Qe2 Qxd5) 18... Nc7?? { (-1.72 → 5.21) Blunder. P@b4 was best. } (18... P@b4) 19. b4?? { (5.21 → -0.95) Blunder. Qxf8+ was best. } (19. Qxf8+ Bxf8) 19... Rfb8?? { (-0.95 → 3.18) Blunder. N@c2 was best. } (19... N@c2) 20. Reb1?? { (3.18 → -1.16) Blunder. B@f4 was best. } (20. B@f4 Qc8 21. P@c5 Ra6 22. b5 N@c4 23. bxa6 Nxd2 24. Bxc7 Qxc7 25. N@e7+ Kh8 26. R@b7 Qxb7) 20... Qc4?? { (-1.16 → 3.30) Blunder. P@c2 was best. } (20... P@c2 21. Rb3) 21. Bf1?? { (3.30 → -12.75) Blunder. B@d6 was best. } (21. B@d6 P@c2 22. Bxc7 cxb1=Q+ 23. Rxb1 Qd3 24. Bxb6 axb6 25. P@a7 Rf8 26. P@b7 Qxd2 27. R@c8 R@c2) 21... Nf6?? { (-12.75 → 3.27) Blunder. N@f3+ was best. } (21... N@f3+ 22. Kg2 Nxd2 23. P@f3 P@c2 24. Bxc4 cxb1=Q 25. Rxb1 Nxb1 26. Nxb1 dxc4 27. Q@e1 B@f8 28. B@c5) 22. Bxc4 dxc4?? { (0.61 → 4.31) Blunder. N@f3+ was best. } (22... N@f3+ 23. Kh1) 23. a5?? { (4.31 → -1.93) Blunder. B@g2 was best. } (23. B@g2 B@f8) 23... R6b7?? { (-1.93 → 4.63) Blunder. N@f3+ was best. } (23... N@f3+ 24. Kh1 Nxd2 25. axb6 P@g2+ 26. Kxg2 B@f3+ 27. Kh2 Nxb1 28. B@g2 R@e1 29. R@g1 Rxg1 30. Bxf3) 24. Qa4?? { (4.63 → -7.98) Blunder. B@g2 was best. } (24. B@g2) 24... Rb5?? { (-7.98 → 4.87) Blunder. N@f3+ was best. } (24... N@f3+) 25. Nxb5?? { (4.87 → -5.57) Blunder. B@g2 was best. } (25. B@g2 P@g4) 25... cxb5 26. Qc2?? { (-4.31 → -10.80) Blunder. Qa2 was best. } (26. Qa2 N@f3+) 26... Ncd5?? { (-10.80 → -1.88) Blunder. B@e4 was best. } (26... B@e4) 27. Kg2?? { (-1.88 → -32.55) Blunder. B@g2 was best. } (27. B@g2 N@e2+) 27... Nh5?? { (-32.55 → 1.07) Blunder. P@f3+ was best. } (27... P@f3+ 28. Kg1) 28. Qe4?? { (1.07 → -8.66) Blunder. B@f3 was best. } (28. B@f3 N@g5) 28... a6?? { (-8.66 → 4.69) Blunder. N@g5 was best. } (28... N@g5 29. B@f3) 29. Be1?? { (4.69 → -14.27) Blunder. P@a7 was best. } (29. P@a7 Rf8) 29... Re8?? { (-14.27 → 1.92) Blunder. B@f5 was best. } (29... B@f5 30. Qh4) 30. Rc1?? { (1.92 → -17.56) Blunder. P@d7 was best. } (30. P@d7 Rf8) 30... f5?? { (-17.56 → Mate in 7) Checkmate is now unavoidable. B@f5 was best. } (30... B@f5 31. Qxd5 exd5 32. N@e7+ Rxe7 33. Q@d8+ Q@e8 34. Qxd5 N@g5 35. B@d1 P@b2 36. Bxh5 bxc1=Q) 31. Qf3?? { (Mate in 7 → -9.20) Lost forced checkmate sequence. P@f7+ was best. } (31. P@f7+ Kh8 32. R@g8+ Rxg8 33. fxg8=Q+ Kxg8 34. Q@e8+ Bf8 35. Q4xe6+ Kg7 36. Qxf8+ Kxf8 37. R@g8#) 31... g5?? { (-9.20 → Mate in 9) Checkmate is now unavoidable. B@e4 was best. } (31... B@e4) 32. Qxh5?! { (Mate in 9 → 18.57) Lost forced checkmate sequence. P@f7+ was best. } { White wins on time. } (32. P@f7+ Kxf7 33. Qxh5+ B@g6 34. N@d6+ Kg8 35. Q@f7+ Bxf7 36. Qxf7+ Kh8 37. R@g8+ Rxg8 38. Qxg8+ Kxg8) 1-0