lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4e52Nf3Nf63Nc3d64h3Be65Ng5Be76Nxe6fxe67Bc4d58exd5exd59Bb3O-O10O-Oc611Re1Nbd712d4exd413Qxd4Bc514Qd2Kh815Na4Ne416Rxe4dxe417Nxc5Nxc518Bc4Qb619Qe2Rae820Be3Qxb221Rd1Nd322Qg4Ne523Qg3Qxc224Rc1Qb225Rd1Qa326Bb3Qe727Bxa7c528Rd5Nd329Bc4Ra830Bb6Rac831Qe3Rc632Ba7b633Bb5Rd634Rxd6Qxd635Qxe4Nxf236Qb7Nd337Bxd3Qxd338Bxb6Rf1+39Kh2Qd6+40g3Qd2+
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/7QjDPyKE"] [Date "2023.05.12"] [White "ElTiempoPaso"] [Black "LemuelGullible"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "7QjDPyKE"] [UTCDate "2023.05.12"] [UTCTime "20:02:38"] [WhiteElo "1996"] [BlackElo "1939"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-29"] [BlackRatingDiff "+29"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "C42"] [Opening "Petrov's Defense: Three Knights Game"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 { C42 Petrov's Defense: Three Knights Game } d6 4. h3 Be6 5. Ng5 Be7 6. Nxe6 fxe6 7. Bc4 d5 8. exd5 exd5 9. Bb3 O-O 10. O-O c6 11. Re1 Nbd7 12. d4 exd4 13. Qxd4 Bc5 14. Qd2 Kh8 15. Na4 Ne4 16. Rxe4 dxe4 17. Nxc5 Nxc5 18. Bc4 Qb6 19. Qe2 Rae8 20. Be3 Qxb2 21. Rd1 Nd3 22. Qg4 Ne5 23. Qg3 Qxc2 24. Rc1 Qb2 25. Rd1 Qa3 26. Bb3 Qe7 27. Bxa7 c5 28. Rd5 Nd3 29. Bc4 Ra8 30. Bb6 Rac8 31. Qe3 Rc6 32. Ba7 b6 33. Bb5 Rd6 34. Rxd6 Qxd6 35. Qxe4 Nxf2 36. Qb7 Nd3 37. Bxd3 Qxd3 38. Bxb6 Rf1+ 39. Kh2 Qd6+ 40. g3 Qd2+ { White resigns. } 0-1
  1. LemuelGullible ah no never mind
  2. LemuelGullible No I thought 9. Nxd5
  3. LemuelGullible I would have lost a pawn
  4. LemuelGullible because if I take back with the knight you have Qh5
  5. ElTiempoPaso I did not see that, it looks better than the game
  6. ElTiempoPaso interesting
  7. LemuelGullible I think so too
  8. LemuelGullible after that my position got really stable
  9. ElTiempoPaso I guess I had to keep the rook at f1 to defend f2 and bring the knight to e2 to defend the king and play c3-d4 at some point
  10. ElTiempoPaso well I will review it deeply
  11. LemuelGullible it was definitely a very interesting game
  12. LemuelGullible even when I was up the exchange it felt like you still had good chance with teh bishop pair
  13. LemuelGullible very annoying to play against
  14. ElTiempoPaso Yes, well, I got the bishop pair and a very open position so I guess I still had chances in the midgame
  15. ElTiempoPaso always based on tactics
  16. LemuelGullible yeah I underestimated that
  17. LemuelGullible that was cool, we can play again som other time if you want
  18. LemuelGullible feels like we are about the same level
  19. ElTiempoPaso but you defended well I probably had stronger moves, I was thinking about 34.Rxd3
  20. ElTiempoPaso yes we are same level, we can play the revenge another day if you'd like
  21. LemuelGullible sounds good, maybe next weekend?
  22. ElTiempoPaso Ok, great
  23. LemuelGullible thanks again!
1