Is the First Engine Advantage a Good Predictor of the Outcome of a Game?

Comments on lichess.org/@/trustlessexp/blog/is-the-first-engine-advantage-a-good-predictor-of-the-outcome-of-a-game/aM3Sn0XS

Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen ... ER=EPR
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ER_=_EPR

Could Chess ... Early Results = End Performance Results
Like a worm hole ... The in-between middle game is the unknown.
Maybe chess engines is still missing that middle game algorithm to merge the opening with the end game.

Holographic Wormhole
youtu.be/uOJCS1W1uzg

Perhaps win rate is sensitive to factors given (at depth 0) by Stockfish's "eval" command; for example maybe "0.5" with good pawn structure is more likely to win than "0.5" with a space or material advantage.

On the BanksiaGui there is a score graph.
The score graph shows the red and blue lines merged into a draw. It would be great to see that graph on lichess.

If you look closely to that graph, the lines started getting closer early in the game. So finding openings that do the opposite show a horizon of a winning game, without even knowing the moves. Maybe engines need to draw the horizon lines out to not end up into a draw game.