Computers are scary
You should not waste more time chatting with this know-it-all robot! :D
Instead, make a course about the Alekhine Defence, one of my favorites and one of the moves that this thing recommended.
By the way, it's funny how it seems confused about Kasparov in one of the answers (giving his name twice, once with the full name and once without the patronymic). :D
Instead, make a course about the Alekhine Defence, one of my favorites and one of the moves that this thing recommended.
By the way, it's funny how it seems confused about Kasparov in one of the answers (giving his name twice, once with the full name and once without the patronymic). :D
The chat transcript images are currently not visible.
@NHL_20 said in #4:
> The chat transcript images are currently not visible.
Good point - removed those now - thanks
> The chat transcript images are currently not visible.
Good point - removed those now - thanks
hello kingkrusher
wow, this thing is huge!
hope one day, this thing works for lichess thru annotating users games..
RIP Mentors
RIP Coaches
RIP annotators
theee Era of AI have arisen!
hope one day, this thing works for lichess thru annotating users games..
RIP Mentors
RIP Coaches
RIP annotators
theee Era of AI have arisen!
Some corrections:
--------------------------------------------
>> What is the best response to the Caro-Kann advance variation for Black?
> The Caro-Kann Advance Variation (1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5) is one of the most aggressive responses for White in the Caro-Kann Defense.
Is the Advance Variation "one of the most agressive responses"? It depends. The lines with an early g4, h4 are agressive, but the lines (after Bf5) with Be2 and O-O are not too sharp positions.
> Black has several options for countering the Caro-Kann Advance Variation (...). Here are some of the most popular responses for Black in this variation:
> The Main Line with Bf5: This is a solid response for Black that aims to control the center of the board and restrict White's pawn structure.
Correct, 3...Bf5 can be considered the main line, though 3...c5 is also a very good move. But i wonder, are there any valid development moves in chess that do _not_ aim to control the center of the board? Also, how does Bf5 restrict whites pawn structure? By preventing f4-f5? Sounds a bit bizarre.
> (...)
> The Counter-Gambit with c5: This is a bold and aggressive response for Black that aims to seize the initiative and create tactical opportunities.
I am not sure what the AI means with this. 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 is a good line, the description of a "bold and agressive response that aims to seize the initiative and create tactical opportunities" doesnt fit.
Actually, I have never heard of any c5 "Counter Gambit" in the Caro Kann, or in any other chess opening. So I did a regex search in the Scid ECO file. It lists 45 "Countergambits". The only one which starts with c5 is "D00c – Queen's Pawn, Mason, Steinitz Countergambit". This has the moves 1.d4 d5 2.Bf4 c5.
> The Exchange Variation: This is a solid response for Black that aims to exchange pieces and simplify the position to a more manageable endgame.
This is not a sub variation of the Advance Caro Kann (e4 c6 d4 d5 e4), but of Caro Kann (e4 c6 d4 d5). It is when white plays 3.exd5. Black usually answers cxd5. Also, it is not a solid response for _black_, but for _white_. The black player can not choose the Exchange Variation, white can.
> The Panov-Botvinnik Attack: This is a more aggressive response for Black that aims to create tactical opportunities and put pressure on White's position.
Like above, this is not a sub variation of the Advance Caro Kann. But of the Exchange Caro Kann. It is the line 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.c4. It is more or less true that it is an agressive attempt to take over the initiative. But again, for _white_, not for _black_. The black player can not choose the Panov.
--------------------------------------------
> As a beginner, it's important to focus on understanding concepts such as controlling the center of the board, developing pieces, and creating pawn structures.
"creating pawn structures" sounds a bit blurry. It seems to hide that ChatGPT does not know much about pawn structures. Would be interesting to see the answer to the question: "How should one move their pawns in chess? What kind of pawn weaknesses are there in chess? Give examples how to make use of pawn weaknesses in the opponents pawn structure."
--------------------------------------------
> Endgame: The endgame is the final stage of a chess game, when there are only a few pieces left on the board. It's important to study endgames as a beginner because they can be simpler and more straightforward than middlegames, but
The sentence ends abrupt here, which ChatGPT does quite often.
--------------------------------------------
> The Sicilian Sveshnikov is characterized by Black's early move d7-d5, which aims to control the center of the board and create tactical opportunities.
Wrong. The Sveshnikov is characterized by the _weakness_ on d5. The whole Sicilian complex is characterized by blacks attempt to achieve the d5 push. Actually this is a main strategy in nearly every black opening where black has not yet a pawn on d5 (in which case playing e5 is usually a main strategy).
--------------------------------------------
>> Who are the most instructive Chess Grandmasters of all time to study?
> 1. Garry Kasparov: (...)
> (...)
> 5. Garry Kimovich Kasparov: (...)
--------------------------------------------
Didnt know that John Nunn has written a book named "Dawn of the Codebreakers".
--------------------------------------------
I stopped reading at "Who are the most important chess hypermodernists?".
Admittedly, ChatGPT is able to build correct sentences without grammatical errors, which even make very much sense most of the time.
On a closer look, one can see, that 50% of the content is well known knowledge which a Google search will reveal in the first few results. The other 50% is self repeating bla bla. For example a lot of sentences say, in different words: "I am not sure, look for yourself, decide on your own".
ChatGPT does what it is supposed to do: Reflect the available knowledge in the world. It doesnt invent anything new. At least not in these answers.
That is not a critic. On just has to be aware what ChatGPT is: A next generation search engine, which can give impressive answers, but also can contain factual errors. One should always double check instead of blindly relying on it. There is a reason that ChatGPT answers are banned on for example Stack Overflow.
--------------------------------------------
>> What is the best response to the Caro-Kann advance variation for Black?
> The Caro-Kann Advance Variation (1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5) is one of the most aggressive responses for White in the Caro-Kann Defense.
Is the Advance Variation "one of the most agressive responses"? It depends. The lines with an early g4, h4 are agressive, but the lines (after Bf5) with Be2 and O-O are not too sharp positions.
> Black has several options for countering the Caro-Kann Advance Variation (...). Here are some of the most popular responses for Black in this variation:
> The Main Line with Bf5: This is a solid response for Black that aims to control the center of the board and restrict White's pawn structure.
Correct, 3...Bf5 can be considered the main line, though 3...c5 is also a very good move. But i wonder, are there any valid development moves in chess that do _not_ aim to control the center of the board? Also, how does Bf5 restrict whites pawn structure? By preventing f4-f5? Sounds a bit bizarre.
> (...)
> The Counter-Gambit with c5: This is a bold and aggressive response for Black that aims to seize the initiative and create tactical opportunities.
I am not sure what the AI means with this. 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 is a good line, the description of a "bold and agressive response that aims to seize the initiative and create tactical opportunities" doesnt fit.
Actually, I have never heard of any c5 "Counter Gambit" in the Caro Kann, or in any other chess opening. So I did a regex search in the Scid ECO file. It lists 45 "Countergambits". The only one which starts with c5 is "D00c – Queen's Pawn, Mason, Steinitz Countergambit". This has the moves 1.d4 d5 2.Bf4 c5.
> The Exchange Variation: This is a solid response for Black that aims to exchange pieces and simplify the position to a more manageable endgame.
This is not a sub variation of the Advance Caro Kann (e4 c6 d4 d5 e4), but of Caro Kann (e4 c6 d4 d5). It is when white plays 3.exd5. Black usually answers cxd5. Also, it is not a solid response for _black_, but for _white_. The black player can not choose the Exchange Variation, white can.
> The Panov-Botvinnik Attack: This is a more aggressive response for Black that aims to create tactical opportunities and put pressure on White's position.
Like above, this is not a sub variation of the Advance Caro Kann. But of the Exchange Caro Kann. It is the line 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.c4. It is more or less true that it is an agressive attempt to take over the initiative. But again, for _white_, not for _black_. The black player can not choose the Panov.
--------------------------------------------
> As a beginner, it's important to focus on understanding concepts such as controlling the center of the board, developing pieces, and creating pawn structures.
"creating pawn structures" sounds a bit blurry. It seems to hide that ChatGPT does not know much about pawn structures. Would be interesting to see the answer to the question: "How should one move their pawns in chess? What kind of pawn weaknesses are there in chess? Give examples how to make use of pawn weaknesses in the opponents pawn structure."
--------------------------------------------
> Endgame: The endgame is the final stage of a chess game, when there are only a few pieces left on the board. It's important to study endgames as a beginner because they can be simpler and more straightforward than middlegames, but
The sentence ends abrupt here, which ChatGPT does quite often.
--------------------------------------------
> The Sicilian Sveshnikov is characterized by Black's early move d7-d5, which aims to control the center of the board and create tactical opportunities.
Wrong. The Sveshnikov is characterized by the _weakness_ on d5. The whole Sicilian complex is characterized by blacks attempt to achieve the d5 push. Actually this is a main strategy in nearly every black opening where black has not yet a pawn on d5 (in which case playing e5 is usually a main strategy).
--------------------------------------------
>> Who are the most instructive Chess Grandmasters of all time to study?
> 1. Garry Kasparov: (...)
> (...)
> 5. Garry Kimovich Kasparov: (...)
--------------------------------------------
Didnt know that John Nunn has written a book named "Dawn of the Codebreakers".
--------------------------------------------
I stopped reading at "Who are the most important chess hypermodernists?".
Admittedly, ChatGPT is able to build correct sentences without grammatical errors, which even make very much sense most of the time.
On a closer look, one can see, that 50% of the content is well known knowledge which a Google search will reveal in the first few results. The other 50% is self repeating bla bla. For example a lot of sentences say, in different words: "I am not sure, look for yourself, decide on your own".
ChatGPT does what it is supposed to do: Reflect the available knowledge in the world. It doesnt invent anything new. At least not in these answers.
That is not a critic. On just has to be aware what ChatGPT is: A next generation search engine, which can give impressive answers, but also can contain factual errors. One should always double check instead of blindly relying on it. There is a reason that ChatGPT answers are banned on for example Stack Overflow.
TLDR:
ChatGPT reflects quite well the written down human knowledge. Including the errors in that knowledge.
ChatGPT reflects quite well the written down human knowledge. Including the errors in that knowledge.
Seems like ChatGPT absolutely forgot about 1. ... e5, which may be the best opening against 1. e4.