Search "user:younameit"

Isn't -7.7 or minus anything an eval for Black's advantage? When it's minus -20 or under, its close to detecting checkmate for black.

https://lichess.org/study/Yf8DgyDn/xC5NBPv3 I can play good chess, in fact, in this example perfect chess. Just doesn't happen often. But people are entitled to their opinion still. Try and stay happy…

For anyone wanting to study this line it's called the Englund gambit accepted. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but Eric Rosen has a nice vid on this line.

In both instances described in this thread Stockfish thinks doublecheckmate is stronger than a move that blows up either the own king or in Gannets case both attacking peices.

https://lichess.org/s3REDUe3/black black has lost the game all games in the database in this position lead a to 1-0. Seems like Stockfish dosn't know atomic as well as I thought.

here is my study: https://lichess.org/study/PVwBFUn5 depth = 88 cloud mode. And the recommendation is wrong. Is your Sf 11 doing the same?

Did the knight logo get coronavirus? Gotta be a reason why his face changed. ;)

Oh goodness. He won the game with a checkmate against a 2700 rated player. If I blunder a mate in 1 like he did I deserve to lose. I don't understand why so many high rated players have a superiority …

I'm getting tired of people aborting games when they start. There needs to be a reminder of sorts about search filters to match people with similar ratings to one another. Or just suffice to say I thi…